Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01221
Original file (ND03-01221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USNR
Docket No. ND03-01221

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received 20030711. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The Applicant listed civilian counsel as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040325. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was 3 to 2 that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “Please consider the Applicant’s outstanding post-service conduct. Mr J_ has consistently shown that he is worthy of an upgraded discharge since his discharge in 1992. Averifiable employment record, extensive community service, certification of non-involvement with civilian authorities, as well as many letters of recommendation have been provided for the Board to consider. Most of all Mr J_ is looking forward to appearing before the Board personally. Only then will the Board really be able to see what kind of man M_ J__ has become.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
W2 for 2002
Certificate of Completion (Detention Officer Training Program)
Detention Officer Class Average Listing
Character Reference Letter dated July 8, 2002
Certificate of Recognition (Student Mentor)
Criminal Record Check Letter dated December 23, 2002
Criminal Record Check Receipt
Criminal Information Request dated December 17, 2002
Reference Letter dated April 29, 2003
Character Reference Letter dated October 30, 2002
Letter in Support dated October 27, 2002
Letter in Support dated October 30, 2002
Letter in Support dated December 10, 2002
Letter in Support dated November 30, 2002
Outstanding Performance Letter dated July 19, 1997
Letter of Appreciation and Thanks

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None
         Active: USN                        None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910731               Date of Discharge: 920707

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 09 29
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rate: SR

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.61 (1)    Behavior: 3.40 (1)                OTA: 3.40

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence : None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910731:  Enlisted in the Seaman Apprenticeship program.

 920501:  NAVDRUGLAB, Oakland, CA reports Applicant’s urine sample received 920427, tested positive for THC.
920513:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Disobeying a lawful order, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $392.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
920519:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
920522:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

920604:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
920606:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): The Executive Officer, serving in the capacities as acting Commanding Officer, authorized urinalysis of Seaman Recruit (Applicant) based on probable cause principle. A reliable eyewitness observed Seaman Recruit (Applicant’s) drug use and a certified drug dog “alerted” several separate times on Seaman Recruit (Applicant’s) bunk coffin locker the following morning. The subsequent authorized urine test produced positive results. Furthermore, Seaman Recruit (Applicant) confessed to at least two instances of drug use over the last several months. Seaman Recruit (Applicant) is determined not drug dependent enclosure (9), refers; no Veterans Treatment Entitlement. Recommended Other Than Honorable discharge.

920707:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).
010309:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND01-00493 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920707 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural error or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered by the Board. The applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, extensive documentation of community service, and evidence of drug free existence, in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore, no relief will be granted.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00493

    Original file (ND01-00493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 24 months of service with no other adverse action. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In his issue, the Board found the applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed an "isolated incident". At this time the applicant has not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00593

    Original file (ND02-00593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Twelve pages from Applicant's service record Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01059

    Original file (ND01-01059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01059 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010810, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant Copies of DD Form 214 (2)Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (2pgs)Copy of Final Qualification as Lee Helm...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00542

    Original file (ND99-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. ]910825: DAAR: Positive for marijuana use, consensual urinalysis, not dependent, evaluated by CAAC.910828: Naval Branch Medical, NAS Alameda, CA: Used 1 - 3 times monthly, drug abuse confirmed, pt appears amenable to administrative separation.910904: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00459

    Original file (ND02-00459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00459 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020225, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 930122 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00019

    Original file (ND01-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.860110: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Amphetamines abuse, 1 to 3 times per month, Nov85, ashore off duty. Discharge recommended other than honorable.860422: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). In response to applicant’s issue 2, the Board found that the psychological report received by the applicant does not exculpate him from his misconduct of record.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00048

    Original file (ND99-00048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, I recommend that Seaman Recruit (applicant) be separated from the naval service with an Other Than Honorable discharge.971118: Chief of Naval Air Training directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01140

    Original file (ND03-01140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. My discharge was based solely on drug-related conduct, Aswauth. Aside from the drugs, my service record was above average, Aswauth.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00757

    Original file (ND01-00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    860308: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse and commission of a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. 860401: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Navy Military Personnel Manual,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00554

    Original file (ND02-00554.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Naval Discharge Review Board of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assemble for review, we continue to support the contentions as set forth by the Applicant, in his request that he be given the opportunity to upgrade his Discharge from a General (Under Honorable Conditions Discharge) to a Navy Services Honorable Discharge. The (FSM)...