Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00757
Original file (ND01-00757.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-AA, USN
Docket No. ND01-00757

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010510, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A personal appearance discharge review hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020924. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service at the time of issue. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.


A personal appearance discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on XXXXXX. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.
If appropriate add the following:
 The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation should read: “_____________” vice “__________”. The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate.






THIS IS THE CORRECT SHELL FOR Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use) effective 851216 - 861005 .

THE FINDING FOR Drug abuse,
(3630620) EFFECTIVE FOR 851216 - 861005 ONLY.

SPN CODE HKK. THE SPN CODE IS EFFECTIVE 821001 - 860910, AND 860911 - 930627. A general discharge is written “UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)”. SPN code change 860911 added “ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION” AS A CHARACTERIZATION OF SERVICE.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

1.       This former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently
 creditable to warrant the Board’s clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Statement from applicant dated May 16, 2000
 Applicant's DD Form 214 (2)
 Character reference dated February 1, 2001
Copy of active duty photo of applicant
 Character reference from K_ A. T_, undated
Character reference from Major J_T. C_, Ret., undated
 Copy of FBI criminal record check, dated August 12, 2002 (2 pages)
 Letters to applicant from Transportation Security Administration dated September 16 and September 4, 2002
 Character letter from Cobb County, Department of Family and Children Services dated January 18, 2001
 Character/job letter from Mars Music dated January 19, 2001
 Character reference from Minister of Music, Elizabeth Baptist Church, dated January 27, 2001
 Character reference from Ann's Nursing Service dated January 23, 2001
Character reference from Criminal Investigator, Fulton County District Attorney, Atlanta Judicial Circuit, Atlanta, GA, undated
 Character reference dated January 31, 2001
 Police record check dated January 30, 2001 (case pending for speeding)
Letter from the Emory Clinic, Inc. dated February 2, 2001 with laboratory reports (3 pages)
 Job/character reference dated July 5, 2001
Character reference from Deputy Director, Department of Communications dated July 17, 2002
Character reference dated August 6, 2002
Character reference dated August 14, 2001
Applicant's resumé (3 pages)
Laboratory test results dated August 13, 2002 (2 pages)
Character reference dated August 20, 2002
Urine drug screen dated August 16, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     840223 - 840325  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 840326               Date of Discharge: 860619

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 02 24
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 33
Highest Rate: AN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.70 (2)    Behavior: 3.40 (3)                OTA: 3.50

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

840401:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.
850717:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana on or about 19May85.
         Award: Forfeiture of $347 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to AA. No indication of appeal in the record.
850904:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, May85, less than monthly, afloat. Search/Seizure urinalysis May85. CAAC found applicant not dependent and recommended Level I treatment. Commanding Officer recommended retention. Comments: A good airman. Performance has not faltered since first NJP for confirmed drug abuse. Has potential for future service. Recommended for advancement and retention in the United States naval service.
860210:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Use of marijuana onboard USS MIDWAY on 4Jan86.
         Award: Forfeiture of $358 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to AA. No indication of appeal in the record.
860211:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by commission of two military offenses involving drug abuse and for serious misconduct as evidenced by commission of a military offense which would warrant a punitive discharge under the Manual for Courts-Martial.
860228:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
860308:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse and commission of a serious offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

860313:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, Jan86, less than monthly, ashore off duty. Inspection urinalysis Jan86. CAAC found applicant not dependent and recommended separation not via VA hospital. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: Second NJP for confirmed drug abuse. Shows no potential for future service. Recommended for separation from the United States naval service.
860324:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. Commanding Officer's comments: I concur with the findings of the Administrative Discharge Board in the case of applicant. Applicant was twice found guilty at Commanding Officer's NJP for violation of Article 112a, both cases being wrongful use of marijuana. This Commanding Officer also concurs in the CNO's policies of zero drug tolerance and separation of two time drug abusers.
 My recommendation remains: Discharge, under other than honorable conditions.

860401:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

 010313:  NDRB documentary record review Docket Number ND00-00727 conducted. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 860619 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The use of illegal drugs is a serious offense and normally warrants a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Despite the record of accomplishments the applicant provided, the Board found that the applicant’s post-service conduct does not sufficiently mitigate the applicant’s misconduct while on active duty. Relief not warranted.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 10/85, effective
16 Dec 85 until 05 Oct 86, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00008

    Original file (ND02-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00008 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and that the narrative reason be changed to some reason less derogatory. The Board found that even a one time drug abuse incident warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 10/85, effective 16 Dec 85 until 05 Oct 86,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01390

    Original file (ND97-01390.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.860827: Medical evaluation found the applicant to be a drug abuser, but not drug dependent.860829: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by the wrongful use of marijuana. The Commanding Officer’s recommendation for Administrative Separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse was forwarded by message to NMPC on 860913, and on 860917,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00727

    Original file (ND00-00727.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.860216: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.860228: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.860308: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00262

    Original file (ND02-00262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    860815: CAAC evaluation: Applicant does not appear psychologically dependent on cocaine but would benefit from a Level II counseling program due to his alcohol abuse.860828: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use cocaine on 860722. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970417 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01020

    Original file (ND01-01020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870515: Applicant placed on mandatory urinalysis program for 180 days.870619: NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA, reported Applicant ’ s urine sample, received 870611, tested positive for THC.Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Identified as having been involved in one drug related incident (positive command directed urine sample) prior to this date. He is not recommended for further naval service.870709: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00907

    Original file (ND01-00907.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00907 Applicant’s Request This application for discharge review, received 010705, requested the characterization of service issued to the Applicant at the time of his discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 860506: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00545

    Original file (ND02-00545.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00545 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 890915: CNMPC BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00891

    Original file (ND01-00891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board voted four to one to change the discharge to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/ Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. Therefore, I strongly recommend that he be administratively separated from the naval service as soon as possible.880112: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). The Board determined the applicant’s post-service conduct has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00650

    Original file (ND03-00650.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040205. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 6, effective 11 Jan 89 until 13 Jun 90, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE B.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00169

    Original file (ND02-00169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    840727: Drug abuse Screening/Evaluation: Self-referral on 19Jul84. 840731: Substance Abuse Report: Tranquilizers/Benzodiazepine abuse, less than monthly Feb84 - Jul84, ashore off duty. It is strongly recommended that SA (Applicant) be administratively processed for separation from the naval service, with a characterization of his service as other than honorable.861022: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).