Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01059
Original file (ND01-01059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-SR, USNR
Docket No. ND01-01059

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010810, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application for review the applicant elected American Legion as representation.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020307. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

 1. (Equity Issue) This former member requests that the Board include provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
 Copy of Enlisted Performance Evaluation Report (2pgs)
 Copy of Final Qualification as Lee Helm Recommendation (3pgs)
Character references (4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 930126               Date of Discharge: 940718

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 04 25
         Inactive: 00 00 28
Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 2

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 33
Highest Rate: SA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Performance: 3.40 (2)    Behavior: 3.30 (2)                OTA: 3.30

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930223:  Ordered to active duty for 24 months under the Seaman Apprenticeship Program.
930717:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Missing official port call due to fault of member), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

940616:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absent from unit, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, cocaine.
Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
940617:  NAVDRUGLAB NORFOLK, VA urinalysis report indicates applicant tested positive for cocaine.
940620:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use of a controlled substance, cocaine, in your current enlistment as evidenced by NJP on 940616.
940620:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to submit statements in own behalf either verbally or in writing and to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
940626:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

940705:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 940718 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00031

    Original file (ND01-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. 870316: Screened by CAAC and found applicant not to be psychologically dependent on cocaine but would benefit from a Level I program.870506: Vacate suspended forfeiture and reduction awarded at CO's NJP of 24Dec86.870506: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your wrongful use of controlled substances to wit:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00706

    Original file (ND00-00706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “I request the Board to review my O.T.H in 1987 in light of my supporting letter s and previous service time (82-86 Honorable). My discharge in 1987 was based on a non-reoccurring incident and since I've become a hard working church going individual.” The NDRB considered the applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00104

    Original file (ND99-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970802: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant raised an equity...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00914

    Original file (ND02-00914.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's resumé PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900330 - 900719 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900720 Date of Discharge: 930515 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 09 26 Inactive: None ]930508: Commanding Officer recommended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00779

    Original file (ND02-00779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.870424: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a careful review of the entire record, including the documentation submitted by the Applicant and personal testimony, the board determined that t he Applicant’s service is equitably characterized as being performed under other than honorable conditions. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 7/86, effective 15 Dec 86 until 14...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00711

    Original file (ND99-00711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920608: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 920624 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00588

    Original file (ND02-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issue 2: Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00556

    Original file (ND04-00556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040922. I understand that effective this date, that I will be placed on a drug urinalysis surveillance program and tested on a regular basis… I further understand that a second drug abuse incident will result in immediate processing for separation from the naval service.880310: DAAR: Substance: Marijuana, ashore off-duty, service directed. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00557

    Original file (ND03-00557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AR, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I never did use drugs during my time in service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01090

    Original file (ND99-01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend command Level counseling and special urinalysis screening (2 x 4).860910: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. 861110: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse as evidenced by a special court-martial conviction for failure to obey a lawful order, and the wrongful use and possession of marijuana, and three positive results for...