Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01033
Original file (ND03-01033.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-OSSN, USN
Docket No. ND03-01033

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030528. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to administration. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040415. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Separation in lieu of trial by court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. My discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated, minor offense. I have over 12 years of exemplary service prior to this incident including the awards of two Navy Achievement Medals. In addition my post separation conduct has been exemplary. I am one semester from my BS degree and holding a 3.64 grade point average. I have been treasurer of Phi Theta Kappa honor society and am also a member of Sigma Beta Delta honor society for business schools. Please consider my many letters of Commendation and letters of Appreciation. I received awards from every service school I ever attended including “Honorman” at Submarine school and distinction everywhere else. Also consider my service record awards such as Overseas Service, Sea Service, Southwest Asian Service and others. I even have tow Good Conduct Awards.
I hope that you agree that 12 years of outstanding service should outweigh my one stupid mistake. Thank you.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of Bachelor of Science Accounting Degree from Elizabeth City State University
Copies of Transcripts (4 pages)
Copy of Certificate of Participation for Outstanding Achievement
Copy of Dean’s List Certificate
Copy of Phi Theta Kappa Society Certificate
Copies of Certificate of Recognition for Outstanding Merit and Academic (2)
Copies of Navy Achievement Medal Citations (2)
Copies of Letters of Commendation Citations (2)
Copy of Letters of Distinction
Copies of Letters of Appreciation Citation (3)
Copy of Certificate of Completion (Enlisted Surface Warfare Specialist)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     790830 - 800122  COG
         Active: USN                        800123 - 850926  HON
         Active: USN                        850927 – 890228  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890301               Date of Discharge: 920804

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 04
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 34                          Years Contracted: 5

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 99

 Highest Rate: OS1

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (3)    Behavior: 3.93 (3)                OTA: 4.00

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: AFEM(3), OSR , SSDR, GCA (2), SASM, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 236

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/separation in lieu of trial by court martial, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890301:  Reenlisted at COMSUBGRU SEVEN by PSD Yokosuka, JA, For 5
years.

 911003:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: (2 Specifications), Specification 1: Absence from unit on or about 0700, 910927 until on or about 0900, 910929, Specification 2: Absence from unit on or about 1230 910930 until on or about 2315, 910931, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey other lawful order.
         Award: Forfeiture of $250.00 pay per month for 2 months, letter of admonition, reduction in rank (suspended). No indication of appeal in the record.

911028:  Missed sailing of vessel from Long Beach, CA en route to Socal Oparea.

911104:  Missed sailing of vessel from Long Beach, CA en route to Socal Oparea.

911107:  Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). Applicant declared a deserter on 911105 having been an unauthorized absentee since 1030, 911007 from USS DAVID R. RAY (DD 971).

920603:  Report of Return of Deserter. Applicant apprehended by civil authorities on 920530 (1348) at Reno, NV. Returned to military control 920530 (1655). Delivered to TPU San Diego ON 920601 for disciplinary action /disposition.
920611:  Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 911007 until 920530 (236days/A).

920630:  Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trail by court-martial. He consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of her/his request. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s) with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of all the charges preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article: 86 UA from 911007 to 920530(236days/A). The Applicant stated he was completely satisfied with the counsel he had received. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that she/he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

920709:  The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant’s discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920804 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1: The Applicant contends that he served the United States well and he is entitled to an upgrade. When the service of a member of U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by a long-term unauthorized absence totaling 236 days which ended by apprehension. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

 The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURTMARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days, upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01233

    Original file (ND99-01233.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issues 1 through 4, there is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. In the applicant’s issue 5, the Board did not find any enlisted performance mark...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00475

    Original file (MD02-00475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00475 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020306, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, the reason for the discharge be changed to secretarial authority, the reenlistment code be changed to RE-1, and corresponding Separation Program Number/Designator changes. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:(1) DOCUMENT...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00516

    Original file (MD00-00516.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. If he continues to experience difficulty adjusting recommend consider for administrative separation.910903: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and misconduct due to minor disciplinary infractions.910903: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01486

    Original file (MD03-01486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Equity Issue: Based on our review of the evidentiary record and in accordance with 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, we request on behalf of this former member the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct. ________________________________________________________________________In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00179

    Original file (MD04-00179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00179 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031107. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. ” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Achievement from Phi Theta Kappa, Honor...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00552

    Original file (ND01-00552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00552 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant suggests he should receive an honorable discharge because his unauthorized absence was less than 90 days. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501325

    Original file (ND0501325.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00995

    Original file (ND99-00995.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, a medical diagnosis on active duty or during post-service, and whether proper or improper, is not an issue upon which this Board can grant relief. The applicant

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00500

    Original file (ND00-00500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00500 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. I just wanted to be able to pursue my dream of becoming a police officer and to help society in helping keep law and order and peace in our country. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00143

    Original file (ND04-00143.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Certificate from Phi Theta Kappa, dated October 6, 2002 The National Dean’s List certificate, dated 2002-2003 Article written by Applicant and P_ I_, MD Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component,...