Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01486
Original file (MD03-01486.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01486

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030915. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant listed the American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040617. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) – Other, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (AMERICAN LEGION):

 “1. Equity Issue: Based on our review of the evidentiary record and in accordance with 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, we request on behalf of this former member the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct.
________________________________________________________________________

In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the following statement in support of this Applicant’s petition.

Review of the service record reflects that this Applicant had satisfactory overall PRO/CON markings of 4.7/4.6 and was issued the RMB. He was convicted by SCM on 891208 for VUCMJ, Art. 86; awarded NJP on 900111 for VUCMJ, Art. 91 and convicted by SPCM 900501 for VUCMJ, Art. 91. The convening authority approved findings and sentence of the SPCM on 911023. Following USNMCMR review, which affirmed the SPCM decision 911023, he was separated with a Bad Conduct Discharge as a result of the court-martial conviction as authorized by MARCORSEPMAN, Par. 1005.

Essentially, as noted on DD Form 293 attachment, this Applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded because of his outstanding post-service conduct and accomplishments. He has submitted 16 pages of documentation attesting to his good post-service character, hard work, educational pursuits and community involvement for the Board’s consideration.

The American Legion’s express purpose in providing this statement and any other submittals or evidence filed is to assist and support this former member in resolving any improprieties or inequities in the character and basis for discharge. Moreover, we rest assured that the NDRB’s final decision will reflect sound equitable principles consistent in law, regulation, policy and discretion as promulgated by title 10 U.S.C., section 1553, and set forth in 32 C.F.R., part 724 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1).

This case is now respectfully submitted for deliberation and disposition. ”




Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant
Reference letter from J_ D. M_
Phi Theta Kappa International Honor Society membership letter
Reference letter from Prof. J_ N_
Reference letter from S_ M_ B_
AS degree certificate
College honors certificate
All USA Academic Team nomination for 2000
Certificate of Recognition
John and Frances A. Tallo Scholarship award
Three IT certifications
Outstanding Employee award
Newspaper article

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                890315 - 890625  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890626               Date of Discharge: 911023

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 03 28 (Doesn’t exclude lost time and appellate leave.)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 48

 Highest Rank: Pvt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.3 (2)                       Conduct: 4.2 (2)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 25

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/As a result of a courts-martial (SPCM) - Other, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

891208:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86.
         Specification: UA from SOI from 891112 to 891122.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $300.00, and confinement for 1 month.
         CA action 891214: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
891208:  To confinement. [EXTRACTED FROM THE DD 214.]

891231:  From confinement to full duty. [EXTRACTED FROM DD214.]

 900111:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disobeyed order from MSgt W_ to get his gear and move to 3d Plt Bks.
         Award: Forfeiture of $150.00 (suspended for 1 month), restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Not appealed.
900111:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent violations of the UCMJ.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

900206:  Vacate suspended punishment from NJP of 900111.
900319:  Applicant requested separation in lieu of trial.

900322:  Request denied.

 900501:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 91:
         Specification: Disobeyed lawful order of GySgt W_ to return to training.
         Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86.
         Specification: UA from 900326 to 900410.
         Findings: to Charge I and specification thereunder, guilty. To Charge II and specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Fine of $482.00 for 4 months, confinement for 100 days, and a bad conduct discharge.
         CA 900612: Sentence approved and ordered executed except for the BCD.

900501:  To confinement. [EXTRACTED FROM DD214.]

900722:  From confinement. [EXTRACTED FROM DD214.]

900803:  To appellate leave.

910122:  NMCCMR: Affirmed findings and sentence.

911023:  SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, bad conduct discharge ordered executed.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19911023 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly convened special court-martial. That sentence was subsequently approved by both the convening and appellate review authorities (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C).

Issue 1. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (C, Part IV). The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The NDRB found the Applicant’s service record absent of any mitigating or extenuating factors sufficient to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURTS-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence; and Article 91, disobedience to a SNCO.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00416

    Original file (MD00-00416.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I truly regret my actions at the time and I request respectfully that my BCD be upgraded to a General.3. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 128, assault.C.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01197

    Original file (ND03-01197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.Review of the service record reflects that this former member was awarded NJP for on 860821 for VUCMJ, Art. Sentence: CHL for 90 days, forfeiture of $400 per...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00333

    Original file (MD00-00333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To Charge III and specification thereunder, guilty Sentence: Confinement for four months, forfeiture of $438.00 pay per mouth for four months, and a bad conduct discharge. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant's issue states: "(Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874(b) (UCMJ) Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174c, enclosure...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00061

    Original file (MD04-00061.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1105.. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION “Equity Issue: Based on our review of the evidentiary record and in accordance with 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, we request on behalf of this former member the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service conduct.In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00227

    Original file (MD01-00227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I've served 11 years 9 months and 28 days of active service and was discharged with a Bad conduct discharge as a result of a Special Court Martial for a violation of Article 114A of the uniform code of Military Justice. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Discharge Upgrading Questionnaire (10 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00035

    Original file (MD01-00035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874(b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board's clemency relief with up-grade to his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on the basis of his post-service conduct. Period of Service Under Review :APPLICANT'S temporary service record incomplete.Date of Enlistment: 880308 Date of Discharge: 920513 (Applicant states discharge date as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00889

    Original file (MD02-00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    001129: Special Court-Martial Supplemental Order: Article 71(c), UCMJ, having been complied with, the Bad Conduct discharge is ordered executed. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 001129 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court-martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority, and executed (A and B). Relief on this...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00514

    Original file (MD01-00514.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant (2pgs) Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501533

    Original file (MD0501533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated No issues for consideration were submitted by the Applicant.Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (American Legion): “ Equity Issue: Pursuant to USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part IV, Paragraph 403 m (7), we request, on behalf of this former member, the Board’s clemency relief with an up-grade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post-service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00465

    Original file (MD00-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 91 (2 Specifications): Disobeying a lawful order from an NCO on 860817. 870817: SSPCMO: Article 71c, UCMJ, having been complied with, Bad Conduct discharge ordered executed. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance...