Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00889
Original file (MD02-00889.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00889

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020607, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable condi-tions). The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Lawton, OK. The applicant listed American Legion as his representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel, all hearings are held in the Washington, DC Area. The Applicant was also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030410. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. (Equity Issue) Pursuant to 10 USC 874 (b) (UCMJ, Article 74) and in accordance with SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraphs 2.24 and 9.3, this former member requests the Board’s clemency relief with up-grade of his characterization of service to under honorable conditions on the basis of his post-service conduct.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Letter from J_ A. B_, Attorney at Law dated April 18, 2002
Employment Recommendation Letter dated May 2, 2002
Character Reference Letter dated August 5, 2001
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Letter from Applicant dated May 5, 2000 (2 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970829 - 971112  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971213               Date of Discharge: 001129

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 09 11
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 48

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.9 (1)                       Conduct: 3.8 (1)

Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE/COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 1105.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

981207:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation of Article 86, Unauthorized Absence; on 981113, the Applicant was UA from his appointed place of duty, specifically, 0545 PT formation at HP-513 and 0700 formation at FC-230 for schedule pool time). Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

981207:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct (Infractions of the UCMJ). Disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

990722:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ Article 91 (5 Specifications):
         Specification 1 : Did on or about 990214, assault Sergeant J_ E. E_, U.S. Marine Corps, a noncommissioned officer, then known by the said Lance Corporal [Applicant] to be a superior noncommissioned officer who then was in the execution of his office, by pushing him with his hands and hitting him in the shoulder with his fist. Specification 2 : Did on or about 990214, was disrespectful in language and deportment toward Sergeant J_ E. E_, U.S. Marine Corps, a non-commissioned officer then known by the said Lance Corporal [Applicant] to be a superior noncommissioned officer who then was in the execution of his office, by saying to him, "Shut the fuck up" and Fuck you, Sergeant" or words to that effect, in a hostile and belligerent manner. Specification 3 : Did on or about 990214, was disrespectful in language and deportment toward Sergeant P_, U.S. Marine Corps, a noncommissioned officer, then known by the said Lance Corporal [Applicant] to be a superior noncommissioned officer who then was in the execution of his office, by saying to him, "I don't give a fuck what rank you are, when we get out of this hummer me and you are going at it”, or words to that effect, in a hostile and menacing manner and by lunging at him in a menacing manner. Specification 4 : Did on or about 990214, was disrespectful in language and deportment toward Sergeant A_ C. K_, U.S. Marine Corps, a noncommissioned officer then known by the said Lance Corporal [Applicant] to be a superior noncommissioned officer who then was in the execution of his office, by saying to him, "Shut the fuck up nigger" and "Fuck you nigger, I'll beat your ass" or words to that effect, by standing up and stepping toward the said Sergeant K_ in a hostile and belligerent manner and by swinging at him with his fist. Specification 5 : Did on or about 990214, was disrespectful in language and deportment toward Sergeant E_ D. M _, U.S. Marine Corps, a noncommissioned officer, then known by the said Lance Corporal [Applicant] to be a superior noncommissioned officer who then was in the execution of his office, by saying to him, "Fuck you, Sergeant" and "As soon as this vehicle stops I'm going to kick your ass", or words to that effect, in a hostile and belligerent manner.
         Charge II: violation of the UCMJ Article 134: Drunk and disorderly on or about 990214.
         Findings: to Charge I and specifications 1, 2, 4 and 5 thereunder, guilty. To specification 3 under Charge I, not guilty. To Charge II and specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 120 days, forfeiture of $639.00 pay per month for 4 months, reduction to E-1.
         CA 990825: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

990722:  To confinement as part of sentence of SPCM.     

991019:  Special Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ Article 112a: Did, at unknown location on diverse occasions, between 980901 and 990731, wrongfully use methamphetamine.
         Findings: to Charge I and specification 1 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 5 months (suspended for 12 months), and a bad conduct discharge.
         CA 991019: Sentence approved and, except for the bad conduct discharge, will be executed, but the execution of that part of the sentence extending to all confinement is suspended for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of trial, at which time, unless sooner vacated, the suspended portion will be remitted without further action.

991027:  From confinement to duty.
        
000207:  To appellate leave.

000808:  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review: Affirmed findings and sentence.

001129:  Special Court-Martial Supplemental Order: Article 71(c), UCMJ, having been complied with, the Bad Conduct discharge is ordered executed.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 001129 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court-martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority, and executed (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1: The Applicant, through counsel, contends that aspects of his post-service conduct, to include continuous employment and additional education should be considered in the recharacterization of his discharge. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge even though there is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant's performance and conduct during the period of service under review may be considered. Verifiable proof of post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of documents that may be provided to the Board to receive consideration of relief based on post-service conduct. At this time, the documentation provided by the Applicant is not sufficient for the Board to consider an upgrade to the characterization of discharge. Relief on this basis is denied.

 The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 950818 until present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of UCMJ Article 112a, Wrongful use of controlled substances.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500660

    Original file (MD0500660.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00660 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050302. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19970305 - 19970427 COG Active: USMC 19970428 - 20001003 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20001004 Date of Discharge: 20021113 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 01 10 (Does not exclude lost...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501311

    Original file (MD0501311.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “MEDICAL.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00601

    Original file (MD02-00601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record (there was NO DISCHARGE PACKAGE AVAILABLE), the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Police Record Report PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970912 - 980628 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980629 Date of Discharge: 991013 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500271

    Original file (MD0500271.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00271 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20041129. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant (3 pgs), undtd Statement in Support of Claim from Applicant (2 pgs), undtd Letter from Applicant dtd February 25, 2005 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00829

    Original file (MD00-00829.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 920501: Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ, Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. (Equity Issue) The applicant states that a disorder, exhibitionism, sufficiently mitigated his misconduct of record to warrant the Board’s relief.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600330

    Original file (MD0600330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ]950128: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Found guilty at NJP on 950106 for Article 128. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 134: Disobeying order to wit: soliciting a money pyramid.960507: SJA review determined the proceedings sufficient in law and fact.960510: GCMCA, Commanding General, 3d...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01207

    Original file (MD01-01207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01207 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010919, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Discrimination: Hispanic Race Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Service Related Documents (25pgs) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00997

    Original file (MD00-00997.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 920520 - 920915 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 920916 Date of Discharge: 960411 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 06 26 (Doesn't exclude lost or confinement...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501346

    Original file (MD0501346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-01346 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050809. Finding : Guilty Charge V: violation of UCMJ, Article 121: (3 specifications)Specification 1: Did, on or about 16 August 1996, steal a 1996 Dodge Neon, of a value in excess of $100.00, the property of Lance Corporal C_ M. M_, U.S. Marine Corps. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300663

    Original file (MD1300663.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    While some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of immaturity to be a mitigating factor or a sufficient reason for misconduct.Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a...