Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01404
Original file (MD03-01404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

, ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01404

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030820. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040526. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “April 14 1999 to Oct 12, 1999, I participated in Operations Shining Hope Joint Guardian, Avid Response, and exercise Atlas Hinge. My duty positively impacted the overall success of each mission. I put in 110% everyday. I have 7 Ribbons 2 medals Kosovo Campaign, Armed forces service medal, Kosovo Campaign with 2 Stars. and Navy Unit Commendation. During this period Service records show that I injured my Left leg/knee during service in 1999. Befor deployment. I continued to have problems during and After deployment. I pushed my self hard to see that my Job and Mission was compleat. Soon after deployment 2000, I underwent surgery at a private facility, shown as a torn hamstring of the Left leg/knee. I think my character of service should at least read: General under Honorable conditions I feel my discharge is inconsistent with the standards of discipline.”

The Applicant indicated he had additional issues, but none were found.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
DVA letter
Letter of Appreciation
VA Form 21-22

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                971031 - 971111  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971112               Date of Discharge: 001006

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 10 25
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 53

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (7)                       Conduct: 2.8 (7)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NUC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980806:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violate BO1700.6H by wrongfully drinking under the age of 21; violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Drive while impaired aboard CLNC.
 Awarded forfeiture of $463.00, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
980806:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Operate a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.16 on Holcomb Blvd., CLNC.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
981109:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Disorderly conduct, drunkenness.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990422:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112: On 990326, drunk on duty.
 Awarded forfeiture of $479.00 per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
990512:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Continued pattern of misconduct.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
990722:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violate Liberty Risk Program by consuming alcohol while in a class “A” status and by failing to remain on the USS Kearsarge after 2200.
 Awarded forfeiture of $479.00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days (restriction and extra duties suspended for 6 months). Not appealed.
990729:  Applicant diagnosed as alcohol dependent at U.S. Naval Hospital, Rota, Spain.
000031:  Applicant acknowledged eligibility for VA substance abuse treatment in conjunction with discharge.
000210:  Summary Court-Martial.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: On 0600, 991230 fail to be present for inspection.
Specification 2: UA from 0700, 000112 to 0900, 000112.
Finding: Guilty to charge and specifications.
 Sentence: Forfeiture of $670.00.
CA 000229: Approved and ordered executed.

000224:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Arrested for DUI and driving without a valid license.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
000301:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the service record, and the comments of your peers.
000301:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
000303:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was six incidents of alcohol abuse and absence without leave.

000918:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000920:  GCMCA [CG, 2d MARDIV] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20001006 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three occasions, one summary court-martial and adverse counseling entries on other occasions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an upgrade to his characterization of service. The Applicant’s record of deployments and injuries do not mitigate his misconduct. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.











Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence; Article 92, disobey a lawful order; Article 111, drunk driving; and Article 112, drunk on duty.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00898

    Original file (MD04-00898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00297

    Original file (MD00-00297.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The base operator should be able to direct you to 22 Area Base Legal Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Admin Board Decision Process Flow Chart Excerpts from the MARCORSEPMAN Excerpts from the Commandant's Planning Guidance Marine Corps Gazette Articles on Leadership, Zero Defect Mentality, and Attrition Rates Lifelong Negative Effects of an OTH Discharge Character...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00892

    Original file (MD03-00892.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 010612: Vacate suspended forfeiture awarded at CO’s NJP dated 010507.010614: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00737

    Original file (MD03-00737.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Honors...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00992

    Original file (MD00-00992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued981026: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: Failed to obey BnO 1700.1F by consuming alcohol while being under the legal age to do so on 2015, 12Oct98.Awarded forfeiture of $519.00 per month for 2 months. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00759

    Original file (MD00-00759.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00759 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000523, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION [Driving a vehicle without proper registration, insurance and disregarding instruction to report to my Company First Sergeant the following day] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued980630: NJP...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00054

    Original file (MD03-00054.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.000301: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Did on or about 0700, 000107, without authority, absent himself from his place of duty at which he was required to be, to wit: section formation at Sakura theater, located at MCAS, Iwakuni, Japan, and did remain so absent until on or about 0715, 000107.Awarded forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month for 1 month (suspended for 3 months),...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01029

    Original file (MD02-01029.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I’m asking my discharge be upgraded to honorable because I can't get any benefits, and I have a serious medical condition (my back) (severe epidermal fibrosis) I had one surgery in the Marine Corps and I now need another one again. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00277

    Original file (MD01-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010103, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide anything to indicate or to show that there exists an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion associated with his discharge at the time of its issuance, and that his rights were...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01092

    Original file (MD01-01092.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The applicant did not provide any of these documents.