Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00887
Original file (MD03-00887.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00887

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030415. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040401. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. I would like to add that when I was in the Marines I was young and newly married with marriage issues. I got disturbing news during my tour and I was unable to separate my issues from my Marine Corps life. I made wrong choices and regret them till this current day. Due to my young and immature ways I hope you can find that an upgrade is due. It has been 6 years and I feel that I have grown up and deserve to have an honorable Discharge and maybe a second chance to serve my country.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Request for a Certificate of Eligibility

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                950810 - 950814  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950815               Date of Discharge: 970423

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 08 09
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 41

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.0 (6)                       Conduct: 3.7 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDM, LOA, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960227:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Failure to be at appointed place of duty, keeping NCOIC informed of whereabouts, and exhibiting history of “excuses” for late returns from liberty.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

961119:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: At MCAS Iwakuni, Japan on 961110 wrongfully obtained a cellular telephone valued at $450.00, the property of a Japanese National, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: At MCAS Iwakuni, Japan on 961110 made a false official statement to a CID agent.
Awarded forfeiture of $490.00 pay per month for 2 months (forfeiture of $490.00 pay per month for 1 month suspended for 6 months), restriction for 45 days (25 days suspended for 6 months), reduction to E-2. Not appealed.
961213:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Concerning NJP on 961119 for violation of the UCMJ: making a false official statement, and stealing from a Japanese National.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
970102:  NJP imposed and suspended on 961119 for a period of 6 months is hereby vacated and the punishment is ordered executed.

970227:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 123a: On 961231, 970108, 970109 and 970112 at MCAS Iwakuni, Japan, did knowingly utter checks in the amount totaling $1050.00 without sufficient funds.
 Awarded forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), extra duties for 30 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
970306:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
970306:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
970307:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was your discreditable involvement with authorities during this enlistment as evident by your two NJP’s, and statements of your supervisors, and other adverse entries contained on page 11 of your service record book.

970408:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

970408:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19970423 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two occasions, adverse counseling entries on other occasions, and a conduct evaluation average below the standard required for honorable service. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.







Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121, larceny; Article 123a, worthless checks; and Article 134, false official statements.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00424

    Original file (ND99-00424.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00424 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990203, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970103 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600030

    Original file (MD0600030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The order was to stay away from an officer of the Navy. 030929: Commanding Officer, Marine Corps Air Station Iwakuni, forwards Applicant’s administrative Separation package to Commander Marine Corps Bases Japan concurring with the recommendation of Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Headquarters Squadron.031114: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00235

    Original file (ND01-00235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 951130: Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Seaman Apprenticeship Program.Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ, Article 121 (Larceny), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600144

    Original file (MD0600144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.000330: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: In that LCpl R_ (Applicant), did on or about 1300, 000302, without authority, absent himself from his place of duty at which he was required to be, to wit: MTOP section, MWSS-171, MCAS Iwakuni, Japan, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00419

    Original file (MD01-00419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00419 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010213, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500604

    Original file (MD0500604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The record shows that the Applicant: o was convicted at nonjudicial punishment (NJP) proceedings on 19991029, 19991209, and 20000913 for violations of Articles 91 (Insubordination) and 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) (3 total specifications) of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600418

    Original file (MD0600418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After reviewing my service records and the contents of this letter, I believe the reviewing board will reconsider my discharge and grant me a “General / Under Honorable Conditions”. PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20020208 - 20020224 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 20020225 Date of Discharge: 20050427 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 02 03 Inactive: None...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00990

    Original file (MD00-00990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.971103: NAVDRUGLAB [San Diego, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 971024, tested positive for THC.971206: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:Specification: Wrongfully use a controlled substance.Awarded forfeiture of $450.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00797

    Original file (MD99-00797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000403. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS, with the Reason for Separation corrected to reflect "Misconduct-Drug abuse (with admin discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)A. Paragraph 6210 MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16C), Change 2, effective 15 Apr 84 until 28 Jul 87.B.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00218

    Original file (MD01-00218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00218 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001211, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s first issue states: “(Equity Issue) This former member avers that his character of service is too...