Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00990
Original file (MD00-00990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00990

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000818, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010215. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. (Equity Issue) His violations of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his overall service record warrants discharge under honorable conditions.

 2. (Equity Issue) This former member further requests that the Board include provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C., enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Job/character reference dated July 25, 2000
Copy of criminal record check dated July 25, 2000

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                931201 - 940814  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940815                        Date of Discharge: 980814

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 04 00 00
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 17 Parental Consent                Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 50
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages

Proficiency: 4.4 (11)                      Conduct: 4.1 (11)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, MM, SSDR (2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

931120:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
960514:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Driving and judgment. Operating a motor vehicle in a reckless manner by excessive speed on board Camp Schwab, can result in serious injuries or death to innocent by standers, passengers, and to yourself.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
961219:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 123 (5 specs):
 Specifications 1-5: Uttered five worthless checks between 15Jul96 and 1Aug96
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (7 specs):
Specifications 1-7: Failed to pay AAFES, telephone, etc between 3Jun96 and 27Aug96 in Okinawa, Japan.
 Awarded forfeiture of $490.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 45 days, reduced to PFC. Reduction to PFC to take effect 1Mar97. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
970819:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Inability to demonstrate financial maturity and responsibility.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
971103:  NAVDRUGLAB [San Diego, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 971024, tested positive for THC.
971206:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Wrongfully use a controlled substance.
 Awarded forfeiture of $450.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
971229:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Wrongful use of a controlled substance. Failure to demonstrate sound judgment and maturity.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
980331:  Substance Abuse evaluation: No substantial information which supports a pattern of drug or alcohol abuse.
980608:  Applicant refused medical officer evaluation.
980707:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
980707:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
980707:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was NAVDRUGLAB San Diego, CA message 032053z Nov97, which reported applicant’s urine sample, received 971024, tested positive for THC.
980729:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
980731:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1st Marine Division (Rein)] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980814 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board disagrees with his assertion that his overall service record warrants an honorable discharge. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Under other than honorable conditions is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for offenses triable by court-martial on two occasions and adverse counseling entries on seven occasions. The applicant’s misconduct included violations of Articles 123a, uttering worthless checks, 112a wrongful use of controlled substance, 86 unauthorized absence, 92 disobedience of a lawful order, and 134, failure to pay legal debts. The applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief is therefore denied.

In the applicant’s second issue, equity as it pertains to post-service conduct, the following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. However, there is no law or regulation that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must be found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice is evident in the applicant’s service record.
At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days or Article 112a, unlawful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00039

    Original file (MD04-00039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00473

    Original file (MD99-00473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00473 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990217, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to change RE Codes. Reenlistment policy of the Marine Corps is promulgated by the Commandant, United States Marine Corps, Code MMPE5, Washington, DC 20380-3001. A review of the applicant’s service record was conducted and the Board determined that the discharge awarded was...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00737

    Original file (MD03-00737.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Honors...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01251

    Original file (ND03-01251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-MMFN, USN Docket No. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00198

    Original file (ND99-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960416: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty.Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.971009: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00512

    Original file (ND01-00512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to scheduling a personal appearance hearing. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620. Dear Sir: I am taking this time to write to you and ask you to review my case and upgrade my discharge, from General under honorable conditions to Honorable Discharge.The reason I was discharged...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00546

    Original file (MD01-00546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received a General Under Honorable Conditions just based on my weight problem. 990804: GCMCA [MCB Hawaii] advised the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the applicant's discharge was directed with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of unsatisfactory performance due to weight control failure. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)A. Paragraph 6206, UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00944

    Original file (MD03-00944.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00944 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030502. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. As the FSM has not submitted any documentation in support of his claim, we as the representative, ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01183

    Original file (ND02-01183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues, as submitted Prior to the documentary discharge review, the Applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 960710: Commenced 36 month of active duty under the Seaman Apprenticeship training program.970912: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: Make a false official statement about a medical appointment to his LPO on 970714. No indication of appeal in the record.980707: Applicant notified of intended...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00484

    Original file (MD01-00484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant (2pgs) Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Commanding General's Separation Authorization Copies of Service Related Documents (13pgs) Letter from State of New York Division of Veteran Affairs Counselor (2pgs) Criminal History Record Check Request Copy of Driving Record Letter from FAS Military Analysis Network (Operation Laser...