Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00618
Original file (ND02-00618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-FA, USN
Docket No. ND02-00618

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Sacramento, CA. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington, D.C. area. The NDRB also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030116. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues, as submitted

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the Applicant introduced no issues as Block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant's DD Form 214
Reference Letter dated May 28, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     910228 - 910506  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910507               Date of Discharge: 931220

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 07 14
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 34                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 14                        AFQT: 57

 Highest Rate: FN
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.60 (2)    Behavior: 3.80 (2)                OTA: 3.80
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SASM with Bronze Star, SSDR
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

930109:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Wrongful appropriation of a cassette and 2 rechargeable batteries from shipmates.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
930603:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, to wit: cocaine.
         Award: Forfeiture of $456 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to FA. No indication of appeal in the record.
930604:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine abuse. Abuse denied. Random urinalysis 930506. Physician found Applicant not dependent and recommended separation. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: 36 year old male with 2 years, 1 month active service. Screened by ESSD DAPA due to positive urinalysis for cocaine. Member was screened by a medical doctor and found not dependent. Member to be processed for separation IAW OPNAVINST 5350.4B.
930630:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
930630:  Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
930827:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. The Board further recommended discharge be suspended for 12 months.

930910:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): Fireman (Applicant) has been on active duty for over two years. He has been disciplined at nonjudicial punishment twice. Once for wrongful appropriation and a second time for wrongful use of cocaine. He successfully convinced the board of his potential for further useful service. The board recommended an Other Than Honorable discharge, however, they also recommended that the discharge be held in abeyance for a period of one year. In order to allow Firearm (Applicant) an opportunity to prove that he can provide useful naval service, I concur with the board's recommendation. I recommend he be separated from the naval service with an Other Than Honorable discharge, suspended for 12 months.
931006:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 931220 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00136

    Original file (ND03-00136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident within 14 months of service with no other adverse action.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (American Legion):“ 2. As this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00283

    Original file (ND00-00283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00283 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000103, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 79 Highest Rate: ET3 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.70 (2) Behavior: 3.70 (2) OTA: 3.80 Military Decorations: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00595

    Original file (ND01-00595.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00595 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010402, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Administrative Discharge Board found the applicant did commit a violation of UCMJ Article 112a but recommended retention due to the applicant’s service record. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good post-service character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00169

    Original file (ND99-00169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.951214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment.951219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.951222: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00362

    Original file (ND03-00362.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00133

    Original file (ND01-00133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MAY SUBMIT ISSUES AT TIME OF HEARING. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Authorization FormCharacter reference letter from “Unity of Faith Worship Center, dated march 19.2001 Character reference letter from OIC business Services, dated May 14, 2001. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00160

    Original file (ND00-00160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 900601 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that “I was told by naval N.I.S. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00324

    Original file (ND99-00324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This investigation has been conducted under suspected violations of Article 112 (a) of the UCMJ, Narcotics.971218: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine possession and abuse ashore, off duty, 971015, medical. Based on the findings of the Administrative Board and with the separation authority granted to me in reference (a), ICFN (applicant) is hereby discharged from the naval service with a characterization of General (Under Honorable Conditions). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00254

    Original file (ND02-00254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    880803: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The applicant states he was released from the military with a handicap. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective 15 Jun 87 until 10 Jan 89, Article...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00651

    Original file (ND99-00651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 920918 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...