Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01003
Original file (MD02-01003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD02-01003

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020708, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030515. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

1. I am 27 years old now and currently enrolled in school, where I'm finishing up (EMT). I'm pursuing a career in the firefighting field. I just completed firefighting academy and am now a certified firefighter and need EMT certification to become hirable. I'm asking for an upgrade because I've always been proud about being a marine and I was a good marine under the command of LT C_ and SSGT P_-Fox Co, Camp Leijiune where I came from Recon, Oslo Bch, after passing the indoct. I chose to stay with infantry. I was stationed at camp Wilson-Mohabbi Dessert not far from Camp Pendleton. We were celebrating, well having a few beers at the beer tent getting ready to come home in the next day or so, when another marine offered a marijuana cigarette to me and a third person (marine). I took a couple of drags and to make a long story short, myself and two other marines were caught and discharged a couple of weeks after the incident. It was not what I had planned for myself and not how I wanted to spend the next 3 yrs of my contract, as a civilian not an active marine. Well, I've learned to move on with my life and never make the same mistake twice. That incident happened when I was 18 or 19 yrs old. I don't want what happened as a teenager to effect the rest of my life. Please consider my request. I would like to continue my career, as a firefighter-EMT at the same time is proud that I served as an infantry marine with an honorable discharge.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Character Reference Letter from A_ L_, dated June 27, 2002
Certificate of Completion (Firefighting Minimum Standards Course) from Daytona Beach Community College dated April 24, 2002
Certificate of Completion (Medical First Responder Course) from Daytona Beach Community College
Certificate of Completion (IRHMI Concept Implementation) from Daytona Beach Community College dated April 9, 2002
Certificate of Completion (IRHMI Basic Concepts) from Daytona Beach Community College dated February 19, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940422 - 941213  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 941214               Date of Discharge: 951010

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 09 27
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 35

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (3)                       Conduct: 3.5 (3)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Rifle Marksman Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940420:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
940421:  Initial enlistment contract documents admission of pre-service marijuana experimentation. Enlistment waiver granted. Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
950907:  NAVDRUGLAB [JACKSONVILLE, FL] reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 950829, tested positive for THC.
950929:  Counseled concerning involvement with a controlled substance/drug.

 950929:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Did at CamLej, NC on or about 950825, test positive for a controlled substance, marijuana (THC), NavDrugLab, Jacksonville, FL msg R071722Z Sep 95 Batch # DK47, Spec 07, Lab# 470068.
Awarded forfeiture of $395.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
951003:  Director, Consolidated Drug and Alcohol Center substance abuse evaluation indicates Applicant was evaluated as the result of a command referral: Diagnostic Impression: Drug abuse.

951003:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
951003:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and the right to submit a statement.

951003:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was based upon violation of Article 112a on or about 950825 for the wrongful use of a controlled substance, marijuana, (THC), Lab Batch #470068/Spec # 07 Message dated 071722Z Sep 95.

951005:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

951005:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine, MarForLant] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 951010 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the offense for which he was discharged. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to 30 Jan 97.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600452

    Original file (MD0600452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00197

    Original file (MD01-00197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E). The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01156

    Original file (MD01-01156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 was discharged from the Marine Corps under Other than Honorable conditions due to the fact that I received a positive result on a urinalysis. old and it has been 5yrs since my discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501222

    Original file (MD0501222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 960131: Commander, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, advised the Commandant of the Marine Corps, that the Applicant will be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00939

    Original file (MD03-00939.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00939 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030424. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Mistakes can happen for one or two reasons, the first is for you to Learn from the mistake.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01123

    Original file (MD01-01123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I had the back of my heel cut off and was lifted by helicopter from the accident to 29 palms naval hospital. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Medical Related Documents (48pgs) Letter from applicantPicture of applicant’s foot DD-214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970320 - 970805 COG Period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00547

    Original file (MD01-00547.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was dealing with some personal issues (divorce) that got in the way of my life & job & duty. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950419 - 950622 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 950623 Date of Discharge: 980202 Length of Service (years,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00342

    Original file (MD00-00342.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 930105 - 930124 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930125 Date of Discharge: 950922 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 07 28 Inactive: None However, the Board is authorized to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00240

    Original file (MD00-00240.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Aviation Maintenance Technician Certification (Powerplant) Aviation Maintenance Technician Certification (Airframe) Copy of Mechanic Certificate from Department of Transportation Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 910962 - 920824 COG Period of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600063

    Original file (MD0600063.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 951128: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.951128: Commanding Officer, Marine Wing Support Squadron 271, recommended Applicant’s discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due...