Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501222
Original file (MD0501222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD05-01222

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050719. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060302. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Realization for my action is not only a significant reality now, but it was also one at the time of my separation. I ask that I may proceed in this society without this blemish. This episode has been reflected on by others of notable status in our society, only to be waived away in disbelief. I am not the same young man that error back then, but a man that has gone forward in spite of this error. I would ask that this may not follow me anymore.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19920407 – 19920615               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19920616             Date of Discharge: 19960223

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 03 08 07
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 51

 Highest Rank: Cpl                                   MOS: 0311

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.1 (9)                                Conduct: 4.0 (9)

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Expert Badge (2 nd Award), National Defense Service Medal, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon (W/1 Star)


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920407:  CG, MCRD waiver, type II authorized.

950517:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:
         Specification: Violation of a lawful order on or about 12 May 1995.
         Award: Forfeiture of $450.00 pay per month for 1 month (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. Not appealed.

950813:  Director, Substance Abuse Counseling Center, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, discharge recommendation. The Applicant was evaluated on October 30, 1995 as a result of a command referral.
         Results of the evaluation: DRUG ABUSE.
         This member (Applicant) should be processed for discharge.
         Recommended: (1) Monitored attendance at 1 NA meeting per week.
         (2) Weekly meeting with unit SACO.
         (3) SNM should return to SACO to receive VA rights

950825:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 950821, tested positive for THC.

950929:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a:
         Specification: At CoC, 1 st Bn, 3dMar on 14 August 95, test positive for THC.
         Award: Forfeiture of $446.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. Not appealed.











951116:  Director, Substance Abuse Counseling Center, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, provides Advisement of VA Rights in the Case of PFC B_ (Applicant).
         The subject member (Applicant) was evaluated on 30 Oct 1995 in accordance with the references as the result of a command referral. Results of the evaluation:
a.       No diagnosis/DSM IV:V71.09
b.       Drug Abuse
The subject named member (Applicant) was briefed on his VA benefits, as they pertain to alcohol/drug treatment. Member (Applicant) was provided with the address of the nearest Veterans Administration Hospital to his home of record. Pending discharge no other form of treatment can be provided.

951211:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Misconduct for illegal use of a controlled substance as evidenced by NAVDRLAB msg R 252033Z AUG 95 ZYBPSN 688066H34 for THC.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.

951229:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:
         Specification: UA from CoC, 1 st Bn, 3d Mar, during the period of 0210 08 December 95 through 0856, 09 December 95.
Violation of UCMJ Article 111:
Specification: At CoC, 1 st Bn, 3d Mar, operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated as evidenced by SNM’s BAC of .099% on 08 December 1995.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. Not appealed.
960106:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse with characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use of marijuana.

960106:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

960110:  Commanding Officer, 1 st Battalion, 3d Marines, Marine Corps Base, recommended to the Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was wrongful use of marijuana. Commanding Officer’s comments: “The Respondent’s actions clearly indicate unsuitability for future military service, therefore, I recommend that the Respondent be expeditiously discharged.”

960130:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

960131:  Commander, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, advised the Commandant of the Marine Corps, that the Applicant will be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19960223 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by 3 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86, 92, 111 and 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to 30 Jan 97.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00750

    Original file (MD04-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    971209: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by wrongful use of marijuana.971209: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.971209: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501154

    Original file (MD0501154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 970422: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base Hawaii, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Relief is not warranted.The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00692

    Original file (MD01-00692.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00692 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010423, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. 950410: Reduction to E-2 imposed and suspended on 941221 is set aside this date.950410: Reduction to E-3 imposed and suspended on 941128 and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600506

    Original file (MD0600506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Since then, I have had only one incident in my civilian life in the three years I have been discharged, and I completed the required probation for it.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s representative (American Legion): “Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00698

    Original file (MD01-00698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00698 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501230

    Original file (MD0501230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19870212 – 19870630 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00075

    Original file (MD04-00075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. _______________________________________________________________________ Issues, as stated Issues 1: “This applicant received a discharge of Under Other Than Honorable Conditions for drug abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600452

    Original file (MD0600452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01474

    Original file (MD04-01474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I hereby sincerely request that my discharge be changes to a general under honorable conditions.I truly regret the mistakes I made during my service in the Marine Corps. At this time, the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of post service character and conduct to mitigate the misconduct that resulted in his characterization of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600527

    Original file (MD0600527.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). My record of promotions showed I was generally a good service member. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970521 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions.