Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01156
Original file (MD01-01156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01156

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010905, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues
Issue 1.
I am writing this letter as an appeal for the upgrade of my Other than Honorable Discharge to an Honorable Discharge. I served for four years in the U. S. Marine Corps. The dates I served were from 920421 to 960416. 1 was discharged from the Marine Corps under Other than Honorable conditions due to the fact that I received a positive result on a urinalysis. I was given Non-Judicial Punishment for my infraction. I was reduced in rank from E-3 to E-2, forfeiture of pay for two months, restriction to quarters for 30 days, and extra duties. As a result of my positive test on my urinalysis, I was sent to the Substance Abuse Office in my unit. I was classified as a Level-3 alcoholic, due to the excessive intake of alcohol I was involved in. I was sent to Great Lakes, IL Naval Hospital for treatment. After my release, I was given a satisfactory evaluation. Although I continued to consume alcohol on a daily basis, I no longer touched drugs. I do not use the alcohol as an excuse for my mistake. I was younger and my judgment was not mature. I deeply regret my mistake while I was in the Marine Corps. I am now 29yrs. old and it has been 5yrs since my discharge. I am married with two children also and as a husband and father, I feel that I have matured a lot since then. On Dec. 5, 1999, 1 gave my life to Jesus Christ, that experience gave me a new outlook on life. I am now sober going on two years. In conclusion, I feel that my discharge should be upgraded to Honorable so I can pursue better opportunities for my family and myself. As for employment my current employer conducts urinalysis. I have enclosed with this letter documents and character references, which I feel are beneficial towards my appeal for an upgrade on my discharge. I thank you for your time and if you need more details please feel free to reach me at my home at the telephone number above.

Thank You,
(Applicant)


 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter from Applicant
Character Reference Letter from M____ V. B____ Sr
Character Reference Letter from Senior Pastor B____ C____
Character Reference Letter from J____ B. D____
Copy of Navy Certificate of Commendation Letter
Copies of Certificate of Commendation Letters (3)
Copy of Certificate of Commendation (Superior Performance)
Copy of Letter of Appreciation
Copy of Certificate of Appreciation
Copy of Certificate of Good Conduct
Copy of Meritorious Mast Certificate
Letter from North Carolina Department of Administration


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                910605 - 920420  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920421               Date of Discharge: 960416

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 11 26
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 57

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.4 (14)                      Conduct: 4.4 (14)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, GCM, LOA (2), COC

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910604:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

950927:  NAVDRUGLAB [JACKSONVILLE, FL], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 950911, tested positive for [THC].

951003:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Between the months of August and September of 1995, did knowingly and wrongfully use marijuana.
 Awarded forfeiture of $478.00.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-2. Not appealed.
951005:  Medically diagnosed as alcohol dependent.

951017:  Counseled regarding deficiencies, specifically, the illegal use of marijuana identified through urinalysis testing at NDSL JAX, batch #0677. Drug identified: TCH. Advised that processing for administrative separation for misconduct is mandatory per MCO P1900.16. Advised the within 5 working days after acknowledgement of this entry a written rebuttal will be filed on the document side of the service record. Applicant chose not to make a statement.

951213:  Applicant completed Level III Treatment and assigned to Level III Aftercare Counseling.

960322:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
xxxxxx:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

960325:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was your in-service substance abuse namely, THC, as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB, JAXFL, MSG R 271000Z SEP 95 and page 12 of your service record.

960411:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

960411:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960416 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The Board found that the applicant’s age, education level, and test scores qualified him for enlistment. While he may feel that his immaturity and youth was a factor that contributed to his actions, the record clearly reflects his willful disregard for the requirements of military discipline and demonstrated that he was unfit for further service. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The record is devoid of evidence that the applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.





Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00286

    Original file (ND04-00286.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00286 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031203. The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to “End of Service (see attached documents).” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. 951115: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by self–referral for drug abuse with the least favorable characterization of service as general (under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00198

    Original file (ND99-00198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :960416: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty.Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.971009: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00703

    Original file (ND00-00703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. ND00-00703 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000509, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical, re-code. My imbalance has restricted my life and I'm requesting the discharge review board to review my discharge and grant me an upgrade.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01040

    Original file (ND04-01040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00670

    Original file (ND03-00670.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00670 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030227. We refer this case to the Board for their careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant's discharge be reviewed for upgrading his discharge to honorable. Issue 2: There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00558

    Original file (MD02-00558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. While he may feel that he just was not able to perform the duties expected of a Marine, the record is devoid of evidence that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00350

    Original file (MD04-00350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00350 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031218. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. First Sargeant M_ stated that my commanding officer should have been informed of the incident so that he could address the issue.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00370

    Original file (ND04-00370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 830919: Applicant to active duty for 36 months in the Active Mariner Program.830920: Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.840323: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Wrongful use of marijuana on 840207. No indication of appeal in the record.890920: Drug and Alcohol Evaluation: Applicant may be dependent on drugs.890927: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00642

    Original file (MD02-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct-Drug abuse (administrative discharge board required but waived) or (with administrative discharge board), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. The finding for Misconduct is effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95, however, the Commandant of the Marine Corps issued an official list of the new DoD SPD codes and narrative reasons for separation on 940701. 930212: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00891

    Original file (MD04-00891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00891 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040506. Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:“Issue I: Change type of discharge to "Honorable" based on the fact that the positive urinalysis was one isolated incident involving drugs in almost five years.Issue II: Change narrative reason for separation to “Completion of Enlistment”, based on the fact that before acquired leave time was sold back, the vetern would have been...