Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00769
Original file (ND01-00769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND01-00769

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010514, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011214. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.






PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues (verbatim)

1. I wanted to get my educational benefits, so that I could go back to school. I was told that I would have to have an (Honorable discharge), or the current one upgraded. In order to get any education benefits, so I was hoping to have this one upgraded.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USNR (DEP)     930812 - 931205  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 931206               Date of Discharge: 950820

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 01 08 15
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 9 GED            AFQT: 35

 Highest Rate: SN
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (2)    Behavior: 2.40 (2)                OTA: 3.30
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM
Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950202:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Insubordinate conduct toward warrant, noncommissioned officer or petty officer.
         Award: Forfeiture of $478 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. Reduction suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
950328:  Retention Warning from PCU Laboon (DDG 58: Advised of deficiency (Disrespect toward a petty officer.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
        
950707:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0900, 7Jul95.

 950710:  Applicant missed ship's movement.
950711:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 0600, 11Jul95. Absence excused as unavoidable, charged 4 days leave.
950802:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence (less than 24 hours), violation of UCMJ, Article 89: Disrespectful toward a commissioned officer, violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Insubordinate conduct, violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (2 specs): Failure to obey order or regulation.
         Award: Forfeiture of $478 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to SA, bread and water for 3 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
950820:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged general (under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
Discharge package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 950820 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board has no obligation to change the applicant’s discharge in order to allow him to go back to school. In addition, there is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (E). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group) and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 92, for failure to obey order or regulation, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00831

    Original file (ND03-00831.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00831 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030407. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Age at Entry: 23 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 43 Highest Rate: SN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 2.67 (3) Behavior: 2.33 (3) OTA: 2.56 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: BER (3), SSDR, AFEM, NDSM...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01254

    Original file (ND02-01254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01254 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020906, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :950330: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Disobey lawful...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00413

    Original file (ND99-00413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.960730: USS KEARSARGE notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by CO’s NJPs on 951212, 960418, 960625, and 960723.960731: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00537

    Original file (ND99-00537.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.920313: USS ESTOCIN notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the imposition of Commanding Officer's Non-Judicial Punishment on 22 Aug 88 for violation of UCMJ Article 86, on 7 October 88 for violation of UCMJ Article 86 and 134, and on 5 March 92 for violation of UCMJ Article 86.920313: Applicant advised of his rights and having...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00378

    Original file (ND02-00378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930430 - 930912 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930913 Date of Discharge: 960410 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01057

    Original file (ND00-01057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 970930 - 980615 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980616 Date of Discharge: 990905 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 02 20 Inactive: None to wit: wrongfully having personal gear...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00238

    Original file (ND00-00238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (EQUITY ISSUE) His violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his otherwise creditable service record is sufficient to warrant a fully honorable discharge.2. (EQUITY ISSUE) This former member further requests that the Board include provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C.,enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of his application. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00222

    Original file (ND02-00222.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $300 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 35 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.871121: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 116: Breach of peace on 0640, 21Nov87. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND00-01055

    Original file (ND00-01055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-01055 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000918, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. 850910: Vacate suspended reduction to SA awarded at CO's NJP of 850424.851001: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence from PT muster), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.851007: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (Absent from appointed place of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00994

    Original file (ND99-00994.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 1: (EQUITY ISSUE) His violations of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member opines that his otherwise creditable service period is sufficient to warrant separation under honorable conditions. Relief is not warranted.The applicant’s representative...