Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00517
Original file (ND01-00517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00517

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010316, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant listed the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010928. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION/Fraudulent entry, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630100.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. (Equity Issue) This former member avers that his uncharacterized discharge is inequitable because he did not intentionally conceal his pre service history and because he was doing what his recruiter told him to do.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Statement from applicant dated January 1, 2001

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     870423 - 870427  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870428               Date of Discharge: 870805

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 03 08
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 24                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 14                        AFQT: 37

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMA                  Behavior: NMA             OTA: NMA

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION/Fraudulent entry, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630100.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

870423:  Application for Enlistment (DD Form 1966): Applicant failed to disclose possession of marijuana under 25 gms on 830223; 830302 applicant was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of $100, plus $25 VCCB, 850307 possession of marijuana under 25 gms; 850308 found guilty and sentenced to pay fine of $100, plus $25 VCCB. The second count of hindering prosecution was dismissed. 870326 improper behavior and resisting arrest; failed to appear 870709 and a warrant for arrest was issued with a cash bail of $350. Note: On the second arrest a 30 day suspended sentence was given on the first charge.

870724:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with an entry level service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by unrevealed pre-service civil involvement with police or judicial authorities.
870723:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

870730:  Commanding officer directed discharge with an entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 870805 with an entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant’s issue states: “(Equity Issue) This former member avers that his uncharacterized discharge is inequitable because he did not intentionally conceal his pre service history and because he was doing what his recruiter told him to do.” The Board found no evidence in the record supporting this issue. The applicant admitted some of his criminal activities on his enlistment contract but chose to omit other convictions. The record shows the applicant was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. His non disclosure at the time of enlistment formed the basis of the fraudulent enlistment. The Board found the discharge accurately describes the applicant’s service. Relief is not warranted.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 7/86, effective
16 Dec 86 until 19 Dec 93, Article 3630100, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENTS AND INDUCTIONS DUE TO FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO NAVAL SERVICE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00341

    Original file (ND01-00341.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board discerned no impropriety concerning the applicant’s enlistment. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00385

    Original file (ND04-00385.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00385 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20040109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to entry level separation or uncharacterized. Once in the service leaving the past behind I received a court notice with date and time. ]010929: Applicant from unauthorized absence 1615, 010929 (3 days/apprehended).011011: Applicant waived right to an administrative discharge board and submitted a statement.011030: Applicant to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00458

    Original file (ND01-00458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010817. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Statement from applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 890807 Date of Discharge: 891006 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00740

    Original file (ND00-00740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Applicant's statement concerning V.A., requesting upgrade of discharge, change of reenlistment code to RE-1, and possible lawsuit (3 pages) List of Character References (5 individuals) Copies of ID's, business cards, pharmacy information, emergency shelter, case worker Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01071

    Original file (ND03-01071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :990312: USN Alcohol and Drug Abuse Screening Certificate (NAVCRUIT 1133/7): Applicant failed to disclose pre-service criminal activity, police record.990528: Commanding Officer, Recruit Training Command authorized Applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry. By regulation, members discharged within the first 180 days of enlistment are given a service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01105

    Original file (ND03-01105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Under Narrative Reason for Seperation: Fraudulent Entry to the best of my knowledge I did nothing to constitute a fraudulent Enlistment resulting in this discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 870723 - 880131 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00003

    Original file (ND99-00003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :900103: Application for Enlistment (DD Form 1966): Applicant failed to disclose any pre-service civil offenses.900425: Applicant provided a statement to Defense Investigative Service revealing pre-service civil arrest.900619: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to reveal at the time of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00946

    Original file (ND02-00946.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-OSSR, USNR Docket No. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 960605 with an uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry (A). The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00694

    Original file (ND02-00694.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00694 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason and separation code for the discharge be changed. Change separation code Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Statement from Applicant concerning issues dated April 4, 2003 with attached Exhibits A-H, J-N (34...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00473

    Original file (ND04-00473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contention of the appellant in his request for a discharge upgrade of his current Un-Characterized discharge to that of Honorable.The FSM served on active service from July 15, 2003 to August 11, 2003 at which time he was discharged due to Fraudulent Entry...