Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00151
Original file (ND01-00151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-MSSN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00151

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review, received 001117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010503. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation

In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:

Copy of DD Form 214
Service Related Documents (15pgs)
Letter from Applicant to Board
Copy of Memphis Housing Authority License
Copy of Millington Police Department Reserve Officer License
Copy of Tennessee Gang Investigator Association Certificate
Copy of Certificate of Training (Correctional Officer)
Copy of Certificate of Achievement (Local Jail Basic Training)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Defensive Tactics)
Copy of Certificate of Training (520 hours Recruit Training Course)
Copy of Certificate of Training (EVOC and Defensive Driving)
Copy of Certificate of Training (PPCT Management Systems Course)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Doppler Radar Operation)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Chemical Weapons)
Copy of Certificate of Training (DUI Detection & Testing)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Hazardous Materials)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Intoxilyzer 1400 Operation)
Copy of Certificate of Training (First Responder Spanish I Training)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Spontanious Knife Defense)
Copy of Certificate of Training (CPR for the Professional Rescuer)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Winchester Expandable Police Baton)
Copy of Certificate of Training (Security Threat Group Training)
Copy of General Under Honorable Discharge Certificate


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     870612 - 870623  COG

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 870624               Date of Discharge: 900312

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 08 19
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 21                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 50

Highest Rate: MS3

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

Performance: 3.46 (3)    Behavior: 3.26 (3)                OTA: 3.60

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, CGSOSR

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

880427:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 per month for 2 months (Forfeiture of $100.00 per month suspended for 1 month), restriction and extra duty for 15 days. No indication of appeal in the record.

880428: 
Retention Warning from [USS EL PASO (LKA-117)]: Advised of deficiency (You were found guilty at Commanding Officer's NJP for Unauthorized absence), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

881028:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespect towards a petty officer, violation of UCMJ Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful order.

         Award: CCU for 30 days, forfeiture of $376.00 per month for 2 months, reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

881028: 
Retention Warning from [USS EL PASO (LKA-117)]: Advised of deficiency (You were found guilty at Commanding Officer's NJP for disrespect towards a Petty Officer and failure to obey a lawful order), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

881107:  Counseling Report.

881117:  Counseling Report.

890609:  Counseling Report.

890712:  Counseling Report.

891114:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Disobeying a lawful order.

         Award: Forfeiture of $429.00 per month for 2 months, extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.

891221:  [USS EL PASO (LKA-117)] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by 1 NJP conviction for unauthorized absence on 880427, (2) NJP conviction for disrespect towards a petty officer and failure to obey a lawful order on 881028, (3) NJP conviction for disobeying a lawful order on 891114.

891229:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.

891230:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

900130:  Commanding officer recommended discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

900223:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge general under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 900312 general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A, Change 8 effective 21 Aug 89 until 14 Aug 91), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00089

    Original file (ND00-00089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 21 Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 30 Highest Rate: FN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.24 (5) Behavior: 3.20 (5) OTA: 3.20 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR(2), CGSOR Days of Unauthorized Absence: 1 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00102

    Original file (ND99-00102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.850831: Commanding Officer USS MOBILE (LKA 115) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct- pattern – frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities as evidenced by five CO NJP's, misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP dated 24 Apr 85, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by CO's NJP's dated 25...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00528

    Original file (ND99-00528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.910502: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 0700, 23Apr91 to 2300, 29Apr91 (6 days) Award: Forfeiture of $000 per month for 0 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 00 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.910503: Retention Warning from USS DURHAM (LKA-114): Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ Article 86 - Unauthorized absence without authority. After a thorough review of the records,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01239

    Original file (ND99-01239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    830820: Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence from NTC, Great Lakes, IL commencing on/or about 0545, 820913 and termination on/or about 0830, 820922 and Unauthorized absence from USS CHARLESTON (LKA-113), located at Norfolk, VA commencing on/or about 830307 and termination on/or about 830423), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning. After a thorough review of the records,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01081

    Original file (ND04-01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. My name is B_ E_ G_-B_ (Applicant). The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00022

    Original file (ND99-00022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    920128: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 90: Willfully disobey a commissioned officer on 911214, violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Willfully disobey a lawful order from superior Chief Petty Officer on 911214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found this issue to be without merit. At this time the applicant has...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01512

    Original file (ND03-01512.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00251

    Original file (ND01-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.931123: [USS SPARTANBURG COUNTY (LST-1192)] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of misconduct as evidenced by all punishments under the UCMJ in your current enlistment.931123: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00412

    Original file (ND04-00412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00629

    Original file (ND01-00629.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. No indication of appeal in the record.910409: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (10 specs): Failed to go at time prescribed to appointed place of duty, restricted personnel muster, various times and dates between 1Mar91 to 10Mar91. Relief is therefore denied concerning this issue.The applicant’s representative submitted the following as issue 2: “(Equity Issue) This former...