Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00412
Original file (ND04-00412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-BMA, USN
Docket No. ND04-00412

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040114. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a personal appearance discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Nashville, TN. The Applicant designated the American Legion as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Board does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington, D.C. area. Applicant responded to the Scheduling Notice and advised he would be unable to attend a personal appearance hearing, and requests a documentary record review. Therefore, a documentary record review was conducted.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040922. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.
PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “Nature of separation to harsh for offense committed.”

Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (AMERICAN LEGION):

 2. “ Equity Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and on behalf of this former member, we request that the Board consider provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), Chapter 9, as it pertains to post-service conduct, in assessing the merits of this application.
_______________________________________________________________________
In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition.

Review of the service record reflects that this former member maintained satisfactory performance and conduct markings with an OTA of 3.3 and earned the SSDR(3), AFEM(2), NDSM, NUC, and SACM(2). He was awarded NJP on 880630 for VUCMJ, Art. 112a; NJP on 890516 for VUCMJ, Art. 128; NJP on 901103 for VUCMJ, Art. 117; NJP on 910726 for VUCMJ, Art. 112a; NJP on 910805 for VUCMJ, Art. 86, 90, 91. Following due process notifications, he was discharged Under Other Than Honorable Conditions due to a pattern of misconduct as authorized by NAVMILPERSMAN, Art. 3630600.

Essentially, as noted on DD Form 293, this Applicant is requesting that his discharge be upgraded because his discharge is too harsh for his offenses. He has not submitted any additional documentation for consideration.

The American Legion’s express purpose in providing this statement and any other submittals or evidence filed is to assist this Applicant in the clarification and resolution of the impropriety or inequity raised. To that end, we rest assured that the NDRB’s final decision will reflect sound equitable principles consistent in law, regulation, policy and discretion as promulgated by title 10 U.S.C., section 1553, and set forth in 32 C.F.R., part 724 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1).

This case is now respectfully submitted for deliberation and disposition. ”


 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     870922 - 870922  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 870923               Date of Discharge: 910906

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 11 14
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 26

 Highest Rate: BM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.24 (5)    Behavior: 3.2 (6)                 OTA: 3.32

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR(3), AFEM(2), NDSM, NUC, SACM(2)

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

870924:  Briefed on the Navy’s Alcohol/Drug abuse policy.

 871110:  Retention Warning from Recruit Training Command, San Diego, CA: Advised of deficiency (as a result of a command directed urinalysis held on 6 June 1988, which proved positive for Cocaine and Marijuana), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

880606:  Retention Warning from USS FLINT (AE-32): Advised of deficiency (as a result of a command directed urinalysis held on 6 June 1988, which proved positive for Cocaine and Marijuana), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

880630:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of controlled substance.
Award: Forfeiture of $329 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.

890526:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault consummated by a battery towards a SR on 16 May 1989.
         Award: Confinement on Bread & Water for 3 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
901103:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 117: Provoking speeches; violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey order or regulation.
Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 14 days, reduction to E-3 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
901103:  Retention Warning from USS FLINT (AE 32): Advised of deficiency (CO, NJP conducted on board for violation of UCMJ, Article 117: provoking speeches and gestures and violation of UCMJ, Article 92: failure to obey order or regulation), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

910726:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful introduction and possession of a controlled substance, to wit: Marijuana.
         Award: Forfeiture of $481.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. Process for admin discharge. No indication of appeal in the record.
910731:  CO, USS FLINT (AE 32) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
910801:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, waived all rights. Applicant did not object to the discharge.
910802:  Commanding Officer, USS FLINT, recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

910805:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absent without leave; violation of UCMJ, Article 90: Willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer; violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Insubordinate conduct toward a chief petty officer.
Award: 3 days bread and water, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
910820:  CO, USS FLINT advises BUPERS that Applicant determined not drug dependent by a physician.

910904:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19910906 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Sailor. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on five separate occasions for violating UCMJ, Articles 86, 91, 92, 112a, 117 and 128 thus substantiating the misconduct . The Applicant’s summary of service clearly reflects the Applicant ’ s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. An upgrade would be inappropriate. Relief denied.

 Issue 2: There is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. E vidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities, are examples of verifiable documents that should be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. At this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.





 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A, Change 8 effective 21 Aug 89 until 14 Aug 91), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00338

    Original file (ND00-00338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.930119: USS DULUTH (LPD-6) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious civilian offense, to wit: reckless driving (due to intoxication); misconduct due to a civilian conviction, to wit: violation of California civil law VC 23103(A) reckless driving (due to intoxication); misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by the following...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00475

    Original file (ND99-00475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I worked really hard for my merits in the Navy and I believe that my discharge should be upgraded to "General" Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Personal statement from applicant Letter from applicant's parents Letter from a doctor from UCSD Outpatient Psychiatric Services dated November 18, 1998 Copy of DD Form 214 Police record check from San Diego Police Department dated March 9, 1999 PART II...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01123

    Original file (ND02-01123.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-01123 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020805, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.910523: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 1800 restricted men's muster and extra duty on 910517. At this time, the Applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01197

    Original file (ND99-01197.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    880414: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault on another service member at or about 1600, 880322, violation of UCMJ Article 134: Drunk and disorderly at 1600, 880322.Award: Forfeiture of $336.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. 880428: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00067

    Original file (ND04-00067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Propriety Issue: Based on our review of evidentiary record and in accordance with on NAVMILPERSMAN, Art. 3640370, we aver on behalf of this former member that an administrative error occurred during the processing of his discharge that warrants the Board’s relief with an appropriate characterization upgrade.In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00732

    Original file (ND03-00732.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00732 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030320. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY. Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.890630: USS KITTY HAWK (CV 63) notified Applicant of intended...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00392

    Original file (ND04-00392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. No indication of appeal in the record.920723: Retention Warning from USS CONNOLY: Advised of deficiency (CO’s NJP’s of 920413 and 920613) notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00465

    Original file (ND04-00465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Mitigating Circumstances At this time I am requesting a review of my discharge. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166, and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00317

    Original file (ND01-00317.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 930219 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500558

    Original file (ND0500558.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: None were submitted PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: 901228 – 910820 (DEP) COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900821 Date of Discharge: 930317 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 06 27 Inactive: 00 07 23 No indication of appeal in the...