Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00113
Original file (ND01-00113.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-GMTSN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00113

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 001031, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing before a travel panel closest to Battle Creek, Michigan 49015. The applicant listed a civilian counsel as the representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. Subsequent to the application, the applicant obtained the American Legion as the representative.

 Decision

A personal appearance discharge review hearing was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010508. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned an inequity, but no impropriety in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was 3 to 2 that the discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. (Equity issue) His single violation of the UCMJ notwithstanding, this former member avers that his overall service record is sufficient to warrant release under honorable conditions.

2. (Equity issue) As evidenced by his supporting documentation, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board’s clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     840618 - 840814  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 840815               Date of Discharge: 870410

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 07 26
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 22                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 54

 Highest Rate: GMT3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.50 (2)             Behavior: 3.40 (2)                OTA: 3.50

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NER

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

840820:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.

 861217:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA reports applicant's urine sample received 861210, tested positive for THC.
861219:  Applicant's statement: “As long as I've been in the Navy I have not used drugs. Not with my rating, I know better.”
861219:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of a controlled substance between 6Nov86 and 5Dec86, to wit: marijuana.
         Award: Forfeiture of $392 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to GMTSN. No indication of appeal in the record.
861230:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
870105:          Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
870127:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1 recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. Dissenting members statement: "I (name deleted), recommend discharge from the Naval Service under General conditions for GMTSN (applicant). The testimony and records at his administrative board convinced me that GMTSN (applicant's) performance has been acceptable in all other respects. I have acted as Senior Member and President on numerous administrative discharge boards over the past several months. Virtually all of these boards have involved drug abuse in some manner and none have resulted in a recommendation for an Other Than Honorable Discharge. In the interest of consistency, I voted for a General Discharge."

870227:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
870302:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

870326:  CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 870410 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, and in conjunction with the factors listed in paragraph 9.3 of reference (a), it was determined that relief is warranted under equitable grounds even though the discharge was determined to have been otherwise equitable and proper at the time of issuance (C and D).

 In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant had a pre-service drug waiver to enter the military. The applicant was briefed on the Navy’s policy on drug and alcohol abuse on 840820. The applicant was brought to CO’s NJP for wrongful use of marijuana and then was administratively processed for separation. The applicant had an Administrative Discharge Board on 870127 that found he had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a vote of 2 to 1, that the discharge characterization should be under other than honorable conditions. The CO concurred with these findings and CNMPC directed the discharge for misconduct due to drug abuse. The Board found that the applicant’s misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of his service and that he was equitably discharged at the time for the offense committed. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

In response to the applicant’s issue 2, the Board found that the applicant’s post service conduct was sufficient to warrant an upgrade to under honorable conditions (general). The applicant suffers from blindness and traumatic brain injury, resulting from a post-military service automobile accident. These facts are supported by official documentation contained in the applicant’s record. The Board found that the applicant is overcoming his disabilities and is performing at his highest possible potential. He has maintained employment, and has had no involvement with civil authorities. The Board therefore voted 3 to 2 to grant relief to the applicant and upgrade his discharge to under honorable conditions (general).

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 7/86, effective
15 Dec 86 until 14 Jun 87, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00015

    Original file (ND01-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    861219: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by your nonjudicial punishment fro attempting to smoke marijuana and for the wrongful use of cocaine.861219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00076

    Original file (ND00-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In issue 1, the applicant states that his “discharge was inequitable because it was based on one NJP incident in 6 years of service with no other adverse action”. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), effective...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00037

    Original file (ND03-00037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    As the supporting documents that I have submitted demonstrate my post service conduct and accomplishments have been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief with upgrade of my character of service. 870618: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, to wit: Sleeping on watch, dereliction of duty, and drunk on duty; and misconduct due to drug abuse as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00133

    Original file (ND01-00133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MAY SUBMIT ISSUES AT TIME OF HEARING. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Authorization FormCharacter reference letter from “Unity of Faith Worship Center, dated march 19.2001 Character reference letter from OIC business Services, dated May 14, 2001. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00812

    Original file (ND99-00812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.860124: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.860127: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by 2 NJP’s for wrongful use of controlled substance.860127: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00875

    Original file (ND00-00875.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 870429 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Additionally, the Board found the applicant was dual processed for drug abuse and missing ship’s movement.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01045

    Original file (ND99-01045.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-01045 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990730, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 871003: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.871005: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01019

    Original file (ND04-01019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01417

    Original file (ND03-01417.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 931217 - 931226 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 931227 Date of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00779

    Original file (ND02-00779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.870424: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. After a careful review of the entire record, including the documentation submitted by the Applicant and personal testimony, the board determined that t he Applicant’s service is equitably characterized as being performed under other than honorable conditions. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 7/86, effective 15 Dec 86 until 14...