Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01208
Original file (MD01-01208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01208

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010924, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020417. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Character Reference Letters (3)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                960109 - 960309  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 960310               Date of Discharge: 990225

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 02 11 23
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 57
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: NMF                  Conduct: NMF

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksmanship Badge, SSDR, LOA

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 28
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

960919:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Academic drop from the (AS) course of instruction, drop code (FAG)] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued
961205:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absent without leave on or about 0545, 961028 until 1300, 961122 (25days).
         Award: Forfeiture of $404.00 pay per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
970115:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Deficiencies in your judgement and integrity, you used your roommates phone to make long distance phone calls without permission, furthermore, you denied using the phone when questioned by your roommate.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued
980701:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [During a two and a half week period you have received 3 letters concerning at least 6 bad checks. You have bee counseled on several occasions about this matter. You state that your wife wrote the checks and that you also cancelled the checking account.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued

980716:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Mismanagement of your checking account resulting in the return of ten checks from MWR due to insufficient funds. The financial irresponsibility of your personal affairs has caused an undue burden upon CSSD-27 and you will be returned to 8 TH MT BN]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued

980910:  Summary Court-Martial.
          Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: UA from A Co, 8 th MTBn, 2d FSSG from 0700, 980721, to 0430, 980724(3days). Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 92: (2 Specifications), Spec 1: Disobeying a lawful order given to him by SSgt B____ to check into A Co, Spec 2: Failed to obey a lawful order given to him by SSgt B____ n 980814 to report to Sgt F_____ immediately after LCpl release from jail that day.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification thereunder, not guilty. To Charge II and specification 1 thereunder, guilty. Specification 2 under Charge II not guilty.
         Sentence: Confinement for 30 days, forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month for 1 month, reduced to E-1.
         CA action 980910: Sentence approved and except for the other than honorable discharge, will be executed.
981007:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
981007:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.
981007:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was the respondent's 4 page 11 entry dated 960919, 970713, 980701, 980716 and NJP dated 961205, 1 Summary Court-Martial dated 980910.

981210:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.

990217:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 990222:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 2d Force Service Support Group] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 990225 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

 The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence; Article 92, failure to obey a lawful general order.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:
                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01085

    Original file (MD02-01085.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Lack of corrective action towards recent page 11 entries dated 980304 and 980701. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.981005: Vacate forfeiture and reduction awarded at CO’s NJP dated 980720 and suspended on 980727. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00894

    Original file (MD00-00894.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00894 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000707, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. At this time the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation of good...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00339

    Original file (MD03-00339.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00339 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20021219. The Applicant requests that the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00541

    Original file (ND99-00541.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is not recommended for reenlistment, but it is my recommendation that AA (Applicant) be discharged from the Naval Service and that his discharge should be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions)." After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The applicant has not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00221

    Original file (MD00-00221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Specification: Failed to be at appointed place of duty on 1630, 3Feb98. The factual basis for this recommendation was applicant's violations of the UCMJ to include unauthorized absence, making and uttering false checks (thirteen offenses), dishonorable failure to pay a debt and failure of the Marine Corps weight control program. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00886

    Original file (MD00-00886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Not appealed.940215: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. 940812: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.940817: GCMCA [Commanding General] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 940823 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B).

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01136

    Original file (MD02-01136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Continued involvement with civilian and military authorities, specifically, failure to maintain sufficient funds in checking account and failure to pay owed bills in a timely manner. Counseled concerning deficiencies: malingering, disobeying a lawful order, making false statements. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The Applicant introduced no...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00818

    Original file (MD00-00818.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    900221: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 134:Specification: Make 14 checks for a total of $1741.73, without sufficient funds to cover the checks. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00615

    Original file (MD00-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Your conviction at Battalion Commanders NJP for wrongful use of a controlled substance] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning 941031: NJP imposed and suspended on 940912 for a period of 6 months is hereby vacated and the punishment is ordered executed.941017: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of misconduct and Drug...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00576

    Original file (ND03-00576.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00576 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030221. I went to his office and he informed me that I was AWOL for a day and would be going to NJP. I ask you to give me back my life and allow me to right the wrong decisions I have made.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (American Legion):