Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01028
Original file (MD01-01028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD01-01028

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010731, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020215. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. I feel my discharge was forced thru quickly. There are other cases in the same battalion where people only received restriction, loss of pay & reduction in rank. I have no prior incidents. I feel that if I were given the chance I would have succeeded in being honorably discharged.
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
          Inactive: USMCR(J)                970829 - 980727  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 980728               Date of Discharge: 000915

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 01 18
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4


Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 61
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.4 (5)                       Conduct: 4.4 (5)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970828:  Acknowledged outstanding of the Marine Corps Policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
000316:  NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 000310, tested positive for cocaine.
000501:  Medical evaluation found member meets criteria for Alcohol Dependence (303.90). Recommend Intensive Outpatient Treatment and Intake Assessment, with MSgt H_ at 0900 on 5 May 00.

 000629:  Medical evaluation found member meets criteria for Alcohol Dependence (303.90) not in remission. Mbr should be processed for admin separation due to treatment failure. In interim or if retained the following is recommended: Weekly follow up with unit SACO and AA meetings 3 times weekly with court card documentation.
000713:  Summary Court Martial
                  Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (2 specs)
                   Specification 1 - On or about 6 Mar 00, wrongfully use cocaine.
                   Specification 2 - On or about 6 Mar 00, wrongfully use ecstasy.
 Charge II (added): violation of the UCMJ, Article 92: On or about 9 Jun 00, violate a lawful general order by consuming alcohol under the age of 21.
 Findings: to Charge I and specifications 1 and 2 thereunder - guilty.
Charge II and specification thereunder - guilty.
 Sentence: Reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $500.00 per month for 1 month, confinement for 30 days.
000816:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct [illegal drug involvement, cocaine and methylenedioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA) used identified through urinalysis]. Advise that administrative discharge processing mandatory.
000816:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
000816:  Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
000821:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was POSITIVE URINALYSIS ON 16 Mar 00.

000901:  Acknowledged eligibility for treatment at a VA Alcohol and Drug Rehab Program after discharge.
000907:  Naval Addictions Rehabilitation and Education Dept, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, CA: Mbr offered MOE, but refused treatment and was advised there were no VA Hospital Addiction Treatment available in conjunction with discharge.
000907:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 000907:  GCMCA [CG, 1 ST FSSG] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000915 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).
Issue 1. The Board considers the propriety and equity of each case based upon its own merits. The applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. The applicant is responsible for his actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.
Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. The applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00853

    Original file (MD01-00853.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the applicant's service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. It is in the best interests of the Marine Corps to separate SNM ASAP.”920427: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a General characterization of service by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by positive urinalysis for cocaine.920429: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00752

    Original file (MD01-00752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of MTI College Enrollment Agreement Copy of Letter of Congratulation into MTI College Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 960622 - 961208 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 961209 Date of Discharge: 000810 Length of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00669

    Original file (MD01-00669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. I go to his office with gunny and he starts reading me my rights and telling me that I popped on the urine test for cocaine. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00864

    Original file (MD04-00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00864 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040427. _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. The Applicant’s Representative states that “this Applicant is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00599

    Original file (MD03-00599.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.990708: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence on 2359, 990629. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans’ benefits and the issue of the Applicant’s Montgomery GI Bill...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00066

    Original file (MD02-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00066 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The factual basis for this recommendation was the respondent's misconduct as evidenced by wrongful use of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00600

    Original file (MD04-00600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. ________________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement to this Applicant’s petition. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00277

    Original file (MD00-00277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00944

    Original file (MD00-00944.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 860730 - 870701 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 870702 Date of Discharge: 910827 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 11 25 Inactive: None Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 90. At...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01058

    Original file (ND00-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-01058 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000915, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. My discharge was inequitable because it was base on one isolated incident in 28 months of service with no other adverse action.