Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00066
Original file (MD02-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-PVT, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00066

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 011002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020529. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Issues

1. Dear Sirs or Mams, I R___ W. R___ am asking for this review for reasons not to make a case that I was innocent in my involvement with drugs at the end of my enlistment. I am writing this because in the last 5 years I have changed my life for the better and have felt the punishments for having this type of discharge. I do however think that I did serve my country well although I didn't stay out of illegal involvement on my down time on base. I also would like to at least gain acceptance in the Reserves of my choice. Thank you for taking the time in looking at my case.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copies of DD Form 214 (2)
Letter in Response from Applicant
 Employment Reference Letters (3)
 Copies of Letters of Appreciation (2)
Character Reference Letter from Mother in Law

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                920521 - 920526  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920527               Date of Discharge: 960214

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 03 07 23
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 37
Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
Proficiency: 4.2 (9)                       Conduct: 4.0 (9)

 Military Decorations: None
Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge, NDSM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920520:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
930503:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Specifically for wrongful consumption of alcoholic beverages while under the age of 21 which led to unacceptable behavior while intoxicated.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
930827:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Drinking underage, 930419]. Specific recommendations for corrective action are Level I program. 930607 assigned to Level I Treatment program, 930611 successfully completed Level.

 940419:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Frequent involvement with alcohol, drunk and disorderly conduct, a DUI dtd 930922, and falsifying and official statement in regards to your broken jaw. Alcohol abuse has been the basis of this period of misconduct therefore this command decided on Level III training (Rehab) vice punitive action for the incidents listed above.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
950203:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault, to wit: SNM was being escorted out of bldg 1629 (E-Club), after provoking a fight, by E-Club manager Mr. C____, then SNM swung and attempted to strike Mr. C_____.
 Awarded forfeiture of $238.00 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duties for 14 days. Not appealed.
950209:  Director, Substance Abuse Counseling Center, Marine Corps Base Hawaii recommendation for discharge ICO LCpl R____ W. R___. SNM is an Aftercare Treatment Failure due to lack of attendance. SMN was dropped from weekly aftercare due to lack of participation in his own recovery. SNM missed Aftercare since 940211.
951016:  Summary Court-Martial.
         Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 (2 Specifications),
         Specification 1: Wrongful use of cocaine 950403, at Oahu, HI; Specification 2: Wrongfully possess cocaine 950403, at Oahu, HI.
         Finding: to Charge I and the specification 1 and 2 thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $569.00 pay per month for 1 month, CHL for 30 days, reduced to E-1.
         CA action 951025: Sentence approved and ordered executed.
951207:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Illegal drug involvement; specifically, using and possessing cocaine.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
951215:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and drug abuse.
951215:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.
951215:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was the respondent's misconduct as evidenced by wrongful use of cocaine, wrongful possession of cocaine, assault, drunk and disorderly conduct, driving under the influence, making a false official statement, and two instances of underage drinking.

960125:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

 960126:  GCMCA [Commanding General] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960214 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issue 1. The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

 Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces.
 Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to 30 Jan 97.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 128, assault; and Article 134, wrongful use of cocaine.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00444

    Original file (MD01-00444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USMC None Inactive: USMCR(J) 930312 - 930823 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00635

    Original file (MD03-00635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. I greatly appreciate the council’s time and effort in looking into this matter, and am eagerly anticipating a positive response.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00536

    Original file (ND02-00536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00536 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical. Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to support the contentions as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00389

    Original file (ND01-00389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890119: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). In the applicant’s issue 2, the applicant states that he was brought to NJP for possession of a butterfly knife, which he explains “was a gift I brought in the Philipines on the way back on the ship.” The Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00707

    Original file (ND00-00707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    851126: Medical evaluation for alcohol abuse found the applicant to be alcohol dependent. 860408: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Cocaine abuse, less than monthly Feb86, ashore off duty. I recommend that Petty Officer (applicant) be discharged from the Naval Service with an Other Than Honorable Discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00020

    Original file (ND02-00020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020217. 960208: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serous offense, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01185

    Original file (ND02-01185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is recommended that the SNM be separated from the naval service. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 920317 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00459

    Original file (ND99-00459.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 36 Highest Rate: SR Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 2.00 (1) Behavior: 2.90 (2) OTA: 2.80 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized Absence: 2 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00730

    Original file (ND02-00730.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Please help me Review Board with a Second Change. Commanding Officer recommended separate from service.880623: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [SNM signed page 13 counseling him on the Navy's policy toward drug abuse 27Apr 87. After a complete review of the record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00773

    Original file (ND00-00773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00773 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000605, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Officers of the Naval Discharge Review Board; I am respectfully submitting this request to have my Discharge upgraded from Other Than Honorable to General Under Honorable Conditions. Again on 84Jan13, SNM was warned and counseled about her misconduct with a third page 13 counseling/warning...