Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00669
Original file (MD01-00669.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD01-00669

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010409, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before a traveling panel closest to Bethlehem, PA. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010928. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Hi my name is R--- R---Jr. and I was a Marine who started my career in the military on October 07 of the year 1997. 1 did boot camp, then schooling and then headed to Hawaii for my duty station. I got there and I loved it and me and my wife started a family. I was an outstanding Marine and was promoted in the ranks quickly. Then came February 27th, the day I went home to Bethlehem, PA for ten days and returned on March 5th of 2000. 1 had a urinalysis test and thought nothing of it. Then two weeks pass and by this time I had already gone to the woods in Hawaii to train and I get back to the motor pool and here the 1stSGT was looking for me. I go to his office with gunny and he starts reading me my rights and telling me that I popped on the urine test for cocaine. I said I never did cocaine in my life and had token a couple hits of marijuana the first day I got on leave and that was it. Now by this time I am talking to the lawyer on base and she's not really believing me and telling me to say different things. Two days before the trial she calls me and says a new military law was passed and that they cant convict me on urine alone. So I go from a Bad Conduct Discharge back to an OTH in an NON JUDICIAL PUNISHMENT again so by this time the marijuana came into the case and I found out the cocaine gets dropped and the marijuana gets hit on me with no urine sample. I told the lawyer I said it out of fear because I didn't really understand why cocaine but then I remember that Saturday morning me and my brother got stopped by the cops and he passed me cocaine and it fell out the bag but then I grabbed it and sweating from being scared it most of went through my pores or something and I popped for it when I got back.


Issue 1) I don't understand why I got kicked out of the service when I was one of the few that loved it and wanted to stay and accept getting put back in the ranks. I got kicked out for Marijuana when it was never proven by the urine test. I had brought the marijuana situation up and felt like I had said the truth all along like I was taught to do.

Issue 2) My next issue is that while I was going threw this situation there were Marines being kept in the Marines with little punishment and it still gob’s on till this date. Them Marines are nasty and don't take pride in what they do. I on the other hand loved what I did and had 33 great months of service. I think it was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident with no other adverse actions.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USMC              None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970730 - 971007  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 971008               Date of Discharge: 000727

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 09 20
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 34

 Highest Rank: Cpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.4 (9)                       Conduct: 4.4 (9)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Marksman Badge

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

970728:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

000316:  NAVDRUGLAB [SAN DIEGO, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 000313, tested positive for [cocaine].

000322:  SACC evaluation report indicates applicant does not meet the criteria for substance abuse or dependency.

000404:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Illegal dug involvement, cocaine usage through urinalysis confirmed by NAVDRUGLab San Diego CA msg 162019z Mar 00]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
000609:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance, NAVDRUBLAB San Diego, CA 162019Z Mar 00.
 Awarded forfeiture of $657.00 per month for 2 months (forfeiture of $300.00 pay per month suspended), restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to E-3. Not appealed.
000623:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
000623:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

000623:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was the respondent's wrongful use of marijuana.

000705:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

000710:  GCMCA [Commanding General] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 000727 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The applicant was discharged for wrongful use of a controlled substance. The applicant admitted to the use of illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The applicant, after consulting with legal counsel, waived his right to contest the characterization of service at an administrative hearing while being processed for discharge on 000623. Under Other Than Honorable conditions most clearly describes the applicant’s characterization of service. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

Issue 2. The applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single misdeed”. The Board believes that the applicant is confusing this with the civilian world wherein some offenses are treated with leniency because they are a first time incident on an otherwise clear record. No such leniency exists in the military. Despite the applicant’s perception that other Marines continue to serve who do not take pride in their work, the applicant is responsible for his own actions and must accept the consequences of his misdeeds. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.
Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled substance.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00536

    Original file (ND02-00536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00536 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to medical. Dear Chairperson:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to support the contentions as...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00937

    Original file (MD00-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00937 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000724, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Board will not grant relief on the basis of this issue.In response to applicant’s issue 2, concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces. Relief is therefore...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600603

    Original file (MD0600603.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). She or no one else know’s about my discharge. He made a conscious decision to use illegal drugs and should be separated from the Marine Corps for his actions.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00691

    Original file (MD01-00691.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00691 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010417, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Employment/Character Reference Letter Character Reference Letters (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01072

    Original file (ND00-01072.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 67 months of outstanding performance of service, as my enlisted service record indicate. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant states in issue 1 that his “discharge is inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident.” The Board found that the applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00859

    Original file (ND02-00859.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant also requested a documentary record discharge review. I am very sorry for using drug in the U.S. Armed forces but after been discharge from the Navy I return home and by the grace of God I got me self together I have been off drug for 13 years. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence that the Applicant is living a drug free life...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00255

    Original file (MD01-00255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Mbr admitted that one of the routine activities they do in their get-togethers is to use marijuana. Pt does not want admission to hospital nor think it is indicated as pt does not appear to be an eminent treat to self or others. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was neither proper nor equitable (D and E).In reviewing the record, the Board noted both the applicant’s enlistment waiver...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00372

    Original file (MD01-00372.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    000107: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Private Z____'s blatant disregard for Marine Corps policy concerning drug abuse indicates the need for separation in this case. Relief is denied.The applicant’s second issue states: “(VFW Issue) This office, acting as counsel, has reviewed the naval records of the above named applicant and respectfully submits them for consideration in accordance with the...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00880

    Original file (MD99-00880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The next day when I got to work Sgt B____ told me I was UA yesterday. 970623: NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE FL reported applicant’s urine sample, received 970613, tested positive for [THC] [Extracted from case file].970630: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00671

    Original file (MD01-00671.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I received a general discharge under other than honorable conditions for testing positive for drugs. I am asking the board to consider my service record prior to my discharge and grant me an upgrade to my discharge. st Marine Division] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.