Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00716
Original file (ND00-00716.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-TMSN, USN
Docket No. ND00-00716

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000510, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the board in the Washington National Capital Region. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 001206. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. Sirs:

I am requesting a discharge review board, based on the wrongful and untimely death of a promising military career. Had I been given adequate council and disclosure of the options available to me, I feel the decisions made under duress, would have been quite different. I had submitted to a urinalyses on 26 May 1999, knowing that nothing would show up. And, having never knowingly used a controlled substance prior, I was taken completely by surprise when traces of cocaine were detected in my urine. I was literally in shock when the reaction presented by the Chief Legal Officer was, "give up, there's nothing you can do about it. Admit to it." While in this distraught psychological condition I found myself late for Muster, which enraged my superiors. The immediate options presented were to either submit to a "Captains Mast" or sign the Discharge papers, and following the instructions of my superiors I found myself signing the discharge papers, not realizing that this action was destroying my life long dream.
Please review my service record, awards, letters of appreciation, and achievements; including the direction of my Boot Camp Choir, directing the Simon Lakes Gospel Choir , direction of the N. S.A. LaMadalana Italy Chapel Choir and vocal solo performances at numerous change of commands, reenlistments, retirements, honor ceremonies, and C.O. request performances. They are a testimony of my love and honor to the U. S. Navy and my desire to return to active duty and be the best sailor I can possibly be.

Respectfully,
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Letter from Director, Sixth Fleet Band dated December 4, 1998
Letter from a LCdr dated January 21, 1997
Letter from Commander dated February 8, 1999
Copy of certificate dated October 23, 1998
Copy of Report and Disposition of Offense(s) dated June 18, 1999
Copy of MILPERSMAN 1000-160

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     960911 - 961015  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 961016               Date of Discharge: 990712

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 08 27
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 28                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 35

 Highest Rate: E3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.00 (2)    Behavior: 2.50 (2)                OTA: 2.40

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: AFSM, NER, NUC, AFEM, SSDR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 7

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990607:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL msg 071445Z Jun 99. No further information found in service record. Extracted from administrative separation processing notice - notification procedure.
990618:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 1200, 10Jun99 to 0930, 18Jun99 (7 days/surrendered), violation of UCMJ Article 112A: Wrongful use of a controlled substance on 26May99.
990621:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB Great Lakes IL msg 071445Z Jun 99 (Positive Urinalysis report for Cocaine use).
990621:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
990625:  Commanding Officer directed the applicant's discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

990706:  Psychiatric evaluation: A/P: Adjustment disorder.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 990712 general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The NDRB found no impropriety or inequity in the discharge and that the applicant was afforded his rights according to regulations. Furthermore, NDRB found the applicant’s issue that he was “late for muster” was in fact an unauthorized absence of seven days. Relief is denied.

The Board found the applicant’s otherwise creditable service was marred by his misconduct (drug use) and unauthorized absence. The applicant’s discharge of General Under Honorable Conditions is appropriate. Relief is denied.

 The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge. The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB.

The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00207

    Original file (ND02-00207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. ]990423: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00170

    Original file (ND02-00170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00170 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011213, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. Award: Forfeiture of $242 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 14 days, reduction to E-1 (suspended for 6 months).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00539

    Original file (ND03-00539.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No further information in service record. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00398

    Original file (ND03-00398.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 020228: Commander, SECOND Naval Construction Brigade authorized the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00041

    Original file (ND03-00041.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00041 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021007, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.991215: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to pattern of misconduct.991215: Applicant advised of his rights and having...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00510

    Original file (ND01-00510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    So I respectfully request to put my past behind me and be granted to feel proud of my enlistment while in the USN. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the applicant states that his “discharge was inequitable because it was based on a single action in 29 month of service.” The Board found that the applicant had several...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01108

    Original file (ND01-01108.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the Board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged in absentia on 000224 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00412

    Original file (ND00-00412.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00412 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000210, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I ask please grant me this upgrade so that I can get a good job and take care of my family. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00190

    Original file (ND01-00190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-HTFN, USN Docket No. ND01-00190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00559

    Original file (ND00-00559.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Notice of appeal of captain's mast and request for discovery of the governmentLetter of deficiency to administrative separation board CO QM2 (applicant), USNAffidavit of M_ R_ H_, Ph.D Statements of character from all immediate supervisors spanning the period of time relevantE-mail correspondence between Capt. 990303: An Administrative...