Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00559
Original file (ND00-00559.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-ET2, USN
Docket No. ND00-00559

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010301. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety but did discern inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was three to two that the character of the discharge shall change. The discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.





PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. My discharge was improper because I did not commit the offense accused of as evidenced by enclosed documentation.

 My discharge was improper because due process of civil rights was violated due to rules of evidence not being applied in the decision making process which eventually led to my being discharged. Some evidence of my innocence was not even considered while supposed evidence of alleged guilt was specifically withheld as referenced by document 2: Letter of deficiency.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
Notice of appeal of captain's mast and request for discovery of the government
 Letter of deficiency to administrative separation board CO QM2 (applicant), USN
 Affidavit of M_ R_ H_, Ph.D
Statements of character from all immediate supervisors spanning the period of time relevant
 E-mail correspondence between Capt. W_ P_ F_, USN, and Capt W_ H_ S_, USN, pertaining to the case of (applicant)
 Enlisted performance record ICO (applicant) (SSN deleted)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        860523 - 910121  HON
 USN                       910122 - 931226  HON
                   USN                       931227 - 951225  HON
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     860315 - 860522  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 951226               Date of Discharge: 990422

 Length of Service (years, months, days):
         Active: 03 03 27
          Inactive: None
Age at Entry: 31                          Years Contracted: 3 (46 months extension)

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 88
Highest Rate: QM1

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (4)    Behavior: 3.50 (4)                OTA: 3.18
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, GCM (3), NRSR, SSDR (5), NEM (2), NER, HSM, MUC

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

981204:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL reports applicant's urine sample received 981130, tested positive for methamphetamine.
990108:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substance on 25Nov98, to wit: methamphetamine.
         Award: Reduction to ET2. Appealed 990201. Appeal denied 990225.
990126:  CAAC screening found the applicant did not meet criteria for abuse or dependency for either alcohol or methamphetamine.

990303:  An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and by a 2 to 1 vote recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.
990326:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 990422 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but inequitable (C and D).
In response to the applicant’s issue, the NDRB found that the applicant’s discharge was proper. To permit relief, an error or injustice must be found to have existed during the period of enlistment under review. There was nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide any documentation, to indicate there existed an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion at the time of discharge. There was no rights violation and no basis for relief. Even though the applicant believes evidence was not considered or withheld, the NDRB determined that the Administrative Discharge Board proceedings were in accordance with Navy regulations. The NDRB requested that the Navy Drug Screening Lab, Great Lakes, IL, retest the applicant’s sample using the Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry test and the results still screened positive for D-methamphetamine, a controlled substance by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
A thorough review was conducted of the applicant’s entire service record including the infraction of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offense, and other evidence presented to the NDRB. The Board found that the applicant’s excellent personal conduct and performance of duty, along with consideration of the factors in paragraph 9.3 of reference (D), mitigated his misconduct. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to general (under honorable conditions). The Board determined that the applicant’s misconduct diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.
The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is still eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.




Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

 The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00017

    Original file (ND04-00017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) does not travel; all hearings are held in the Washington DC area. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00858

    Original file (ND01-00858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 930414 - 951112 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 921021 - 930413 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 951113 Date of Discharge: 000808 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 04 08 25 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 21...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00074

    Original file (ND02-00074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-DC3, USN Docket No. ND02-00074 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011012, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requests to re-enlist and to serve the U.S. under his issue 7.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00133

    Original file (ND03-00133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Information Inquiry Authorization to Congressman W_ M. T_, dated June 22, 2002 Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of DD Form 149 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 960316 - 960414 COG Active: USN None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960415 Date of Discharge: 980902 Length of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00474

    Original file (ND04-00474.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-ET3, USN Docket No. My family and I has moved back to Louisiana, and on or about December 10, I posted my resume on-line in hopes of finding a job so I can continue to support my family. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00728

    Original file (ND04-00728.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. .” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00320

    Original file (ND02-00320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00320 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, documentation of community service,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00528

    Original file (ND04-00528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    as well as I did not know the illegality of the offense until brought to my attention by the authorities. A single discreditable incident with military or civilian authorities may form the basis for determining the character of a member’s service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00937

    Original file (ND04-00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AR, USN Docket No. ND04-00937 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040520. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions, entry level separation or uncharacterized.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00923

    Original file (ND03-00923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. My desire to be successful has allowed me to see that in order to be successful in life I can’t have any setbacks such as the one that lead to my discharge.C_ W_ W_ (Applicant)” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Criminal record checks...