Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00207
Original file (ND02-00207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-FR, USN
Docket No. ND02-00207

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020731. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as submitted

 1. WHEN I WENT INTO THE SERVICE, I MADE SEVERAL VERY BAD MISTAKES, ONE, WAS NOT BEING MAN ENOUGH TO STAND UP FOR WHAT I BELIEVED IN AND I FELL IN WITH THE WRONG CROWD. THIS NOT AN EXCUSE, JUST A STATEMENT OF FACT. I SINCERELY WISH THAT I COULD HAVE IT TO REDO AGAIN. SINCE BEING DISCHARGED I HAVE CHANGED MY LIFE AND AM A WORKING MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY. I AM A MEMBER OF THE B ELL CHOIR AT MY CHURCH, (BETHEL LUTHERAN-MORTON, IL). I AM HOPEFUL THAT YOU WILL GRANT MY REQUEST FOR CHANGING THE DISCHARGE TO HONORABLE AND THE RE-CODE TO AND RE-1.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     980319 - 980907  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 980908               Date of Discharge: 990507

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 08 00
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 73

 Highest Rate: FR

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*        Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

*No Marks Found in service record.

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

990317:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: wrongful use of a controlled substance (2 specs) - used marijuana and LSD (Lysergic acid diethylamide) on or about 21 Feb 99.
         Award: Not Known. [EXTRACTED FROM CO'S LTR OF 23 APR 99]
990325:  NAVDRUGLAB, Great Lakes, IL, report: Duty section sweep. Urinalysis received on 22MAR99, positive for marijuana.
[NOTIFICATION OF DISCHARGE PROCESSING AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RIGHTS NOT CONTAINED IN SERVICE RECORD.]

 990423:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): "On 17 March 1999, FR A_ (Applicant) attended Commanding Officer's Nonjudicial Punishment for violation of the UCMJ Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance) x 2 specifications. He used marijuana and LSD (Lysergic acid diethylamide) on or about 21 February 1999. His conduct is detrimental to good order and discipline in the Naval service.”

990427:  COMSUBGRU TWO directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 990507 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.

The applicant used illegal drugs. Drug abuse warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

 Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. Relief denied.

He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 to 19 May 99, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00190

    Original file (ND01-00190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-HTFN, USN Docket No. ND01-00190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00905

    Original file (ND02-00905.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00905 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020610, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 940819 - 960402 COG Active:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00586

    Original file (ND02-00586.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    001027: Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved Applicant's discharge with a discharge characterization of general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 001228 with a discharge characterization of general (under honorable conditions) for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A). The Applicant

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00453

    Original file (ND00-00453.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 970519 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The applicant clearly established a pattern of misconduct in his 10 months of service that warranted a discharge under other than honorable conditions. The NDRB found no impropriety in the applicant’s discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01153

    Original file (ND02-01153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    970924: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge general under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 971215 with a characterization of general under honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00553

    Original file (ND01-00553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. I was SK of the month in my division in Oct. 97. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00026

    Original file (ND99-00026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.971107: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by applicant’s positive urinalysis for use of lysergic acid diethylamide on or about 21 August 1997.971107: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.971114: Commanding officer directed discharge general...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00924

    Original file (ND01-00924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00924 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010711, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Thank you for your time and understanding I served the navy proudly and admirably for two years, with the exception of one stupid mistake. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01196

    Original file (ND01-01196.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-CMCR, USN Docket No. ND01-01196 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Personal Reference ltr from EMCS(SW) S.E.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00615

    Original file (ND01-00615.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am requesting that my discharge be upgraded to the highest possible level due to the fact that I had one isolated incident in 30 months of service, and have otherwise an exemplary service record. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the applicant was discharged. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE B.