Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00490
Original file (ND00-00490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-EOCA, USNR
Docket No. ND00-00490

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 000307, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a personal appearance hearing discharge review. The applicant listed a civilian as his representative on the DD Form 293 but subsequently elected the American Legion as his representative. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010111. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630800.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. THE PERSON PREPARING MY DISCHARGE PROMISED THAT I WOULD RECEIVE A DISCHARGE "EXACTLY AS IF I HAD SERVED MY CONTRACT." I RECEIVED A GENERAL NOT HONORABLE DISCHARGE.

2. IF IN ORDER TO RECEIVE AN HONORABLE DISCHARGE I WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE MY CONTRACT, THAN I AM READY AND WILLING.

3. I DID CONTACT MY NEW DUTY STATION AT BROOKLYN, NY WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF MY ARRIVAL BACK IN NEW YORK STATE MAKING THE UNSAT DUE TO UNSAT PARTICIPATION A FALSEHOOD. RESPECTFULLY REQUEST RECONSIDERATION AS A SAT MEMBER OF THE CB'S "CAN DO!"

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
American Legion's ltr of comments/recommendation dtd 6 Dec 2000
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)
Applicant's undtd ltr to the American Legion concerning move to New York
American Legion's ltr to Applicant dtd 24Aug 2000
Applicant's Parent ltr dtd Aug 28, 2000 with copy of date book
Beekman Rooming House receipt (8/25 to 9/1) dtd 25 Aug 2000
Beekman Rooming House ltr of 26 Aug 2000 concerning applicant's residence
Congressional correspondence dated Apr 17, 2000
Applicant's letter to Congresswoman S_ K_ dtd Mar 23, 2000

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950920               Date of Discharge: 980924

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 05 13
         Inactive: 02 06 22

 Age at Entry: 25                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 16                        AFQT: 99

 Highest Rate: EO3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF                  Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630800.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

951212:  Commenced initial Active Duty for Training under the Sea & Air Mariner ( SAM) Program.
950524:  Released from active duty for training having service 5 months and 13 days and received characterization of service as "honorable".
950920:  Applicant acknowledged the requirements to participate in 43 or 48 (90%) scheduled drills including inactive duty training, perform a minimum of 12 days annual active duty for training within each fiscal years.

980717:  Letter of intent to administratively separate with a General Under Honorable Conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent. Applicant signed the notification letter. Missed drills on the 14Mar98, 4Apr98, 5APR98, 2May98, 3May98, 6Jun98, 7Jun98.
980717:  Applicant advised of his rights and elected to waive all rights.

980728:  Commanding Officer, NMCRC Spokane recommended to BUPERS that applicant be discharge with an honorable due to unsatisfactory participation in the Naval Reserve. "Commanding officer’s comments: (verbatim): "Attempted to notify member several times to discuss participation requirements. Member is considered not a mobilization asset. Respectfully request SNM be honorably discharged."

980828:  BUPERS returned the separation packaged to CO, NMCRC Spokane and advised the separation authority is the Special Court Martial Convening Authority and member should be separated locally.

980924:  Commanding Officer directed applicant’s discharge general (under honorable conditions) and stated “reason for characterizing his service as General is: Failure to maintain satisfactory drill participation.”

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 980924 with a general (under honorable conditions) for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge based on his missed drills, which he knew were his requirement to complete. The Board found that the Commanding Officer had the discretion and ultimate authority to separate the applicant under these conditions. The applicant states in issue 1 that “ the person preparing my discharge promised that I would receive a discharge exactly as if I had served my contract. I received a general not honorable discharge.” The Board does not know who the “person preparing” the applicant’s discharge package is, nor did that individual have the authority over the discharge. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

In the applicant’s issue 2, the Board does not have the authority to allow the applicant to reenter the service. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to re-enlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment. Relief is not warranted.

Although the applicant alleges in issue 3 that he contacted his new duty station within 2 weeks of his arrival to NY, this has no bearing on the fact that the applicant missed drills on 14Mar98, 4Apr98, 5APR98, 2May98, 3May98, 6Jun98, and 7Jun98. Additionally, the Board cited his signature and election of rights dated 980717. The applicant was properly discharged for Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve and is deserving of a characterization of general (under honorable conditions) characterization. Relief is denied.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 1997 until Present, Article 1910-158 (formerly 3630800), Separation by Reason of Unsatisfactory Participation in the Ready Reserve.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00292

    Original file (ND01-00292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00292 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010116, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 930515: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had been an unsatisfactory participant in the Ready Reserve, warrants separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01075

    Original file (ND03-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW ______________________________________________________________________ Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20021203 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) for misconduct due to commission of serious offense and for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A). You should read Enclosure (5) of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00761

    Original file (MD00-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00761 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000523, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable, or general/under honorable conditions, or entry level separation, or uncharacterized but would prefer honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 990420 under other than honorable conditions due to unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00382

    Original file (MD01-00382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was trying to make ends meet for my family and at the same time I had to attend my drills without pay. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (E and F).The applicant’s issue was a letter in which he described contributing factors in his discharge as well as dental issues that caused him to not participate in required drills. The Board found no evidence in the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00153

    Original file (MD03-00153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “While I was serving my Reserve obligation I was put on TNPQ, Temporarily Not Physically Qualified, status because of a shoulder injury I received in the summer of 1995. Being that there was no record of my injury I was labeled as UNSAT and was given an “Under other than honorable” administrative discharge from the reserves. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00591

    Original file (ND99-00591.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00591 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990324, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:State Bar of California (Office of Admissions) dated Jul 10, 1998 Santa Clara University School of Law transcript (Fall 1993) PART II -...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01046

    Original file (MD00-01046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-01046 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000913, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Separation Authority dtd 12 Jun 1998 Admin Discharge package ( 9 pages) Reserve Absence 984 Remarks dtd 03/08/1998 Applicant's Record of Military Process - Armed...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00891

    Original file (MD00-00891.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00891 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000707, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. My Characterization of Service is, Under Other Than Honorable Conditions and the Separation Code is HSG1 - (Failure to Participate - Reserve not on active duty). 981015: GCMCA [Commander, Marine Forces Reserve] directed the applicant's discharge under conditions other than honorable by reason of misconduct due to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500006

    Original file (ND0500006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered: Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900830 Date of Discharge:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01179

    Original file (MD03-01179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 000519: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)