Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500006
Original file (ND0500006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-CMCA, USNR
Docket No. ND05-00006

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040929. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041229. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was four to one that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630800.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “The attached document will serve as the foundation for my request. I wish no request for monetary or financial gain. All that I ask is that you restore the honor that I once carried as both Master-at-Arms and “Red Banner” carrier while in Active Service. I wish to serve my country once again, even in light of the horror of terrorism we currently face. I wish to serve my nation with the same valor that pushed me to graduate Camp Nimitz RTC-NTC with a 3.8 rating on a 4.0 scale. I eat, sleep and drink every moment of my military service. I assure you that the actions/discharge of my reserve duty are merely administrative oversights.

Please review this recommendation/request for change in release and re-entry. Please let me show my pride. Please let me serve my wonderful country again.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 900830               Date of Discharge: 930818

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 05 07
         Inactive: 02 06 13

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 8

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 64

 Highest Rate: CMCA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: NMF*                 Behavior: NMF             OTA: NMF

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630800.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920404:  Referred to the N&MRC Roanoke Professional Development Board due to failure to advance to E3 after 18 months or more. Board determined that Applicant was an unsatisfactory participant in drills.
921220:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (frequent unexcused absences from drill), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.
930609:  Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail, return receipt requested. Applicant receipted for letter by return signature but failed to acknowledge the contents. In the event of the Applicant’s failure to acknowledge official certified mail, the separation process shall continue (MILPERSMAN 36402000).
930806:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve due to failure to maintain satisfactory drill participation. Applicant has 38 unexcused drills.

930818:  CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve due to failure to maintain satisfactory drill participation.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19930818 under other than honorable conditions for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a sailor. T he Applicant’s service was marred by his failure to participate in his reserve unit drills. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls short of that required for an honorable or under honorable (general) characterization of service. The Applicant’s dissatisfaction with his reserve unit chain of command and the distances he had to commute to attend drill do not excuse his failure to drill. The positive aspects of his service do not mitigate his misconduct. An upgrade is inappropriate. Relief denied.

 The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.







Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 7, effective 30 Jul 93 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630800, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF UNSATISFACTORY PARTICIPATION IN THE READY RESERVE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01194

    Original file (ND04-01194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 010620: Commanding Officer directed discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserves. Issue 1: Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01075

    Original file (ND03-01075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW ______________________________________________________________________ Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20021203 with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) for misconduct due to commission of serious offense and for unsatisfactory participation in the Ready Reserve (A). You should read Enclosure (5) of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00490

    Original file (ND00-00490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00490 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000307, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that the applicant received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge based on his missed...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00591

    Original file (ND99-00591.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00591 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990324, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:State Bar of California (Office of Admissions) dated Jul 10, 1998 Santa Clara University School of Law transcript (Fall 1993) PART II -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500536

    Original file (ND0500536.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00006

    Original file (ND03-00006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :900918: Enlistment contract into the USNR documents acknowledgement of the requirement to participate in 48 scheduled drills and not less than 14 days of annual training per year for 6 years upon completion of initial active duty training.980728: Commanding officer notified the Applicant of unsatisfactory drill participation via certified letter.940728: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00834

    Original file (ND99-00834.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2) Employment references Excerpts from applicant’s service record (material previously available to the board) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 000000 - 000000 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 850116 – 850226 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 850227 Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00117

    Original file (ND04-00117.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00117 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031022. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Current phone number is incorrect or has been disconnected.920605: Letter of intent to administratively separate under other than honorable conditions for the failure to participate in reserve training was sent via certified mail to the last known...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00292

    Original file (ND01-00292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00292 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010116, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 930515: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had been an unsatisfactory participant in the Ready Reserve, warrants separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00557

    Original file (ND04-00557.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-QM3, USNR-R Docket No. Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry into the naval service or any other of the Armed Forces. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of...