Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00476
Original file (MD00-00476.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD00-00476

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010301, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011218. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

1. I would like to start off by saying how stupid I was for not staying in the military, every day I think and wish I was still in, I can only blame my self but the reason was for a girl.

 DEAR BOARD,

I AM WRITING THIS LETTER TO GET MY DISCHARGE UPGRADED AND THEN REENLIST INTO THE MILITARY. AS YOU CAN SEE I HAVE A OTHER THAN HONORABLE WITH A POM AND MY REENLISTMENT CODE IS 4 AND THE RECRUITER TOLD ME WITH A CODE OF 3 HE CAN REENLIST ME WITH A WAIVER. I KNOW I MADE A STUPID MISTAKE AND PRAY I CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

WHEN THIS HAPPENED I WAS, OR I THOUGHT I WAS IN LOVE AND THE GIRL I WAS WITH TOLD ME SHE WOULD LEAVE ME IF I DIDN'T STAY HERE AT HOME WITH HER AND BEING THE FOOL I STAYED WITH HER AND ENDED UP LOSING A GREAT LIFE IN THE MILITARY AND THE GIRL. I WANT TO MAKE UP FOR IT, AND REENLIST AND STAY IN THE MILITARY FOR LIFE OR AT LEAST UNTIL I RETIRE. ALL I NEED IS A LEVEL 3, PLEASE HELP ME WITH THIS. I HAVE MATURED SINCE THEN AND NOT A DAY GOES BY WITHOUT ME WISHING THAT I COULD CHANGE THE PAST AND LEFT THE GIRL AND STAYED IN THE MILITARY. WITH THIS CHANCE YOU CAN GIVE ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO BETTER MY LIFE AND RIGHT THE WRONGS. THANK YOU, SINCERELY
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies)
Letter from applicant dated March 13, 2000

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                970210 - 970803  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 970804               Date of Discharge: 981004

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 02 01
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 49

 Highest Rank: Pvt

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (2)                       Conduct: 1.8 (4)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 121

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980604:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs):
 Specification 1: Unauthorized absence from 0700, 28Dec97 to 0700, 22Feb98 (55 days/apprehended).
Specification 2: Unauthorized absence from 1600, 13Mar98 to 2045, 19May98 (66 days/apprehended).
Awarded forfeiture of $463.00 per month for 2 months, correctional custody for 30 days. Not appealed.
980605:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [NJP held 980604 for violation of Article 86 x 2 of the UCMJ, specifically; unauthorized absence]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
980623:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91:
 Specification: Disobeyed order from 1 st Sgt to train by refusing to train on 12Jun98.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 134:
Specification: Escaped while undergoing correctional custody on 0420, 12Jun98.
Awarded forfeiture of $428.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days. Not appealed.
980623:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [NJP held 980623 for violation of Articles 91, 134; specifically, disobeying a lawful order, and escaping from CCU. This is counter to all sense of good order and discipline as well as the core values taught at Marine Corps recruit training]. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
980709:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
980709:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

980709:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The factual basis for this recommendation was your nonjudicial punishment of 980604 and 980623.

980922:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

980925:  GCMCA [Commander, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, NC] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 981004 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1. The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter. Relief is therefore denied.

The applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. The discharge was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide sufficient documentation to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required. Relief denied.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days; Article 91, disobeying orders.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls10.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00533

    Original file (MD03-00533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation Only the service and medical records were reviewed, as the Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board to consider. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20001214, as stated by the Applicant, under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00068

    Original file (ND04-00068.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600). Issues 2 and 3: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Navy Discharge Review Board.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501556

    Original file (ND0501556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19960321 –...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01189

    Original file (MD99-01189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01189 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990903, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Age at Entry: 20 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 41 Highest Rank: PFC Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Proficiency: 4.3 (3) Conduct: 3.8 (3) Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Rifle Sharpshooter Badge, LOA Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01243

    Original file (MD02-01243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was discharged from the military on an other than honorable, and would like to have my record changed to an honorable discharge. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:DD Form 149 Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 950131 - 950807 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01039

    Original file (ND99-01039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "I strongly agree with the Board's findings and recommend that OSSR (Applicant) be administratively discharged from the naval service by reason of his misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, and that the characterization of his discharge be under Other Than Honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00116

    Original file (ND03-00116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AO3, USN Docket No. Thanks again Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Sixty-six pages from Applicant service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19911115 – 19920322 COG Active: USNR 19920323 –...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00553

    Original file (ND03-00553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00553 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20030212, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant is not eligible for further review by the Naval Discharge Review Board. Decision A documentary review discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031017.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00552

    Original file (ND04-00552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: unauthorized absence; violation of UCMJ Article 87 (2 specs): missing movement; violation of UCMJ Article 92 (2 specs): disobey a lawful order.. Award: Forfeiture of $539 per month for 2 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to OSSA suspended for 6 mos. You may view DoD Directive...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00036

    Original file (MD02-00036.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00036 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Semper Fi Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive:...