Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01175
Original file (ND99-01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AKAR, USN
Docket No. ND99-01175

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990901, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000512. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS(GENERAL)/Alcohol Abuse - rehabilitation failure, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630550.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

1. My discharge was improper because I have a disease called alcoholism. There is an overabundance of medical statistics to back my statement up. Although I was in some trouble during my time of service, I was still a good sailor. Since my discharge I have become a productive member of society and have been sober for more than 3 years. I know some of my decisions were wrong, however my evaluations were still good. Thank your very much.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     881130 - 881221  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 881222               Date of Discharge: 910426

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 04 05
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 80

 Highest Rate: AKAN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.52 (5)    Behavior: 3.36 (5)                OTA: 3.76

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, AFEM, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 4

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS(GENERAL)/Alcohol abuse - rehabilitation failure, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630550.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890709:  Medical Record: Assessment/Diagnosis: acute alcoholic intoxication. ETOH level: .196%.
900317:  Medical Department USS Enterprise: CAAC ETOH eval. Self referral for ETOH eval. Imp: Alcohol abuse no dependence. Plan: recommend Level II. Antabuse not recommended.
901019:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs): (1) Absent from appointed place of duty on 0730-0900, 8Sep90, (2) Absent from appointed place of duty on 0730-1030, 9Sep90, violation of UCMJ Article 91: Disrespectful in the deportment toward AK1 by pointing his finger in the face of AK1 on 9Sep90, violation of UCMJ Article 92 (3 specs): (1) Fail to obey a lawful order issued by Lt to report to NAS Lemoore Supply immediately on 9Sep90, (2) Fail to obey a lawful general regulation to wit: SECNAVINST 1700.11C of 21Jul86, that the sale, possession, and consumption of alcoholic beverages on naval installations shall conform to drinking limitations of the state or country in which the installation is located, by wrongfully consuming alcoholic beverages while under the legal drinking age of 21 for the state of California on 1Oct90, (3) Fail to obey a lawful regulation to wit: NASLEMOOREINST 11101.1M of 11Feb85, that civilian guests under the age of 18 years are permitted in lounge areas only, by wrongfully allowing civilian guests under the age of 18 years in unauthorized areas in Barracks 12, NAS Lemoore on 30Sep90.
         Award: Forfeiture of $421.85 per month for 2 months, restriction for 20 days, reduction to AKAR. Forfeiture suspended for 1 month. No indication of appeal in the record.
901029:  Naval Hospital Lemoore, CA: S: 3 rd referral for ETOH - feels he failed level II. U/A due to hangover. CAAC suggests level 3 - pt feels it is necessary. This a/d referral from CAAC screener suggest to me need for level III.
901101:  Admitted to Alcohol Rehabilitation Department.

 901214:  Alcohol Rehabilitation Department discharge diagnoses: Alcohol dependence. Follow up at CAAC.
901217:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Misconduct (NJP) in the case of alcohol, incident number three.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

910127:  Applicant to ER NAVHOSP Lemoore for competence for duty. ETOH Level .069%. Disposition: Full duty after 8 PM. Referred to CAAC.

910301:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with type under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by your continued alcohol abuse subsequent to inpatient treatment within the last 12 months.
910305:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

910419:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs): (1) Wrongfully absent himself from his appointed place of duty 0800, 26Mar91 to 0745, 27Mar91, (2) Wrongfully absent himself from his appointed place of duty on 0800, 4Apr91 to 0830, 8Apr91 (4 days).
         Award: Restriction for 7 days, reduction to AKAR. No indication of appeal in the record.
910604:  Commanding officer directed discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): AR (applicant) attended Level III alcohol rehabilitation and elected to continue alcohol consumption upon his completion of Level III. He had displayed a total lack of concern toward Navy Regulations as well as his personal well being. Due to his continued use of alcohol, AR (applicant) became a burden to this command. Due to his attendance in the Level III program, no further treatment was offered prior to his discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 910426 under honorable conditions (general) due to alcohol abuse - rehabilitation failure (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In response to the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found that although the applicant may have had above average marks while in the service, this was overshadowed by the applicant’s misconduct. The applicant attended Level III alcohol rehabilitation in November 1990, but then continued to have alcohol related incidents after completion of treatment. He was also given retention warnings and opportunities to correct his misconduct, but failed to do that. He was given a General discharge which the Board found to be equitable taking into consideration his entire service record. No relief will be granted based on this issue.

There is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the Service. However, the Board is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge (D). Those factors include, but are not limited to, the following: evidence of continuing educational pursuits (transcripts, diplomas, degrees, vocational-technical certificates), a verifiable employment record (Letter of Recommendation from boss), documentation of community service (letter from the activity/community group), certification of non-involvement with civil authorities (police records check) and proof of his not using drugs (detoxification certificate, AA meeting attendance or letter documenting participation in the program) in order for consideration for clemency based on post-service conduct. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation of good character and conduct. Therefore no relief will be granted. The applicant is encouraged to continue with his pursuits and is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15-years from the date of discharge.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, effective 15 Jun 87 - 15 Aug 91), Article 3630550, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION FAILURE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Room 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1997_Navy | ND97-01330

    Original file (ND97-01330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board recommended that the discharge be a general discharge and that the applicant be sent through Level III treatment. j. prior military service and type of discharge received or outstanding post-service conduct to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the performance of the applicant during the period of service which is the subject of the discharge review; On 890810, the applicant was diagnosed as an alcohol abuser and recommended for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00382

    Original file (ND99-00382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950216: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure with a characterization of service as type warranted by service record. Determination: discharge proper and equitable; relief not warranted. The applicant had two retention warnings for alcohol related incidents after completion of Level II alcohol treatment.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00173

    Original file (ND01-00173.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    HR (applicant) will be retained on board this command awaiting final decision from Commander, NMPC.870915: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge with type warranted by service record by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board finds no reason to change the characterization of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00834

    Original file (ND00-00834.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My discharge Under Other Than Honorable Conditions is inequitable based on the recommendation of Dr. J. D_, MD, Drug/Alcohol Screening Evaluation of 21 October 1993 at the Naval Hospital, Lemoore, CA. this alcohol related incident, a previous civilian DUI arrest, treatment for alcohol abuse at Level II (CV-60) in May 1993 and he was diagnosed as alcohol dependent by a medical officer on 21 Oct 1993. No relief based on this issue.In response to the applicant’s issue 3, the applicant had an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00064

    Original file (ND99-00064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00064 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981020, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.871112: Applicant discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.Discharge package missing from service record. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 871112 under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00613

    Original file (ND03-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUE 3: I refused alcohol rehab. He was ordered to report to Intensive Outpatient Treatment for alcohol abuse as a result of CAAC and physician recommendations. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until Present, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00605

    Original file (ND01-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00605 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010402, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed. The summary of service clearly documents that alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure was the reason the applicant was discharged. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 18, effective 12 Dec 97 until Present, Article 1910-152 (formerly Article 3630550), SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL ABUSE REHABILITATION.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00147

    Original file (ND99-00147.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00147 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981106, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority. The applicant was discharged 961104] Commanding officer discharged applicant with General (under Honorable conditions) by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure. SN (applicant) was separated from the Naval service with the characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00129

    Original file (ND00-00129.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I (applicant), am requesting to change my discharge of General Under Honorable Conditions to Honorable Conditions I feel my discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980605 with a general (under honorable conditions) due to alcohol rehabilitation failure (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500221

    Original file (ND0500221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I have completed rehabilitation for alcohol abuse with in recommended time. Age at Entry: 20 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 26 Highest Rate: SN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.27 (3) Behavior: 3.13 (3) OTA: 3.27 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, SASM, NUC Days of Unauthorized...