Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00691
Original file (ND99-00691.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND99-00691

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990421, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000201. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of DD Form 214
NA Form 13046
County of Fulton Veterans Service Agency statement
VA Form 21-4138 Statement in Support of Claim submitted by applicant

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     851115 - 851119  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 851120                        Date of Discharge: 861003

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 00 10 14
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 17                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 50

 Highest Rate: FA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.0 (1)     Behavior: 2.1 (2)                 OTA: 2.55 (4.0 scale)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None

Days of Unauthorized Absence: 0

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

860721:  Counseling: Advised of deficiency (unauthorized absence), notified of corrective actions and assistance available.

860801:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from USS Camden on or about 0730, 86 July 17 until 1400 86 July 18; violation of UCMJ Article 92: Disobeying a lawful order on or about 86 July 17; violation of UCMJ Article 112a (2 specs): wrongful use of marijuana on or about 86July 17 (spec 1) and possession of marijuana on or about 86 July 17..
         Award: Forfeiture of $319 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
860916:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO’s NJP on 860801.

860917:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.

860918:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
861014:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse

860925:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 861003 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). Relief denied.

 The following is provided for the applicant’s edification. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The applicant must be aware that there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, may be considered by the NDRB. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at personal appearance hearing is highly recommended.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 10/85, effective
16 Dec 85 until 05 Oct 86, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00008

    Original file (ND02-00008.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00008 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010925, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and that the narrative reason be changed to some reason less derogatory. The Board found that even a one time drug abuse incident warranted processing for separation, normally under other than honorable conditions. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560), Change 10/85, effective 16 Dec 85 until 05 Oct 86,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00262

    Original file (ND02-00262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    860815: CAAC evaluation: Applicant does not appear psychologically dependent on cocaine but would benefit from a Level II counseling program due to his alcohol abuse.860828: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongfully use cocaine on 860722. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970417 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00171

    Original file (ND00-00171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) As the documentary evidence of record supports, this former member opines that his post-service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board's clemency relief as authorized under provision of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s first issue states:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00111

    Original file (ND02-00111.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Equity Issue) This former member opines that his post service conduct has been sufficiently creditable to warrant the Board’s clemency relief as authorized under provisions of SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 9.3. 861003: Vacate reduction to ENFN awarded at CO's NJP dated 7Aug86 due to continued misconduct. It is recommended that he be discharged with other than honorable discharge.861115: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00373

    Original file (ND00-00373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00373 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.860924: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis for cocaine and misconduct due to commission of a serious...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01090

    Original file (ND99-01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommend command Level counseling and special urinalysis screening (2 x 4).860910: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent. 861110: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse as evidenced by a special court-martial conviction for failure to obey a lawful order, and the wrongful use and possession of marijuana, and three positive results for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00706

    Original file (ND00-00706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “I request the Board to review my O.T.H in 1987 in light of my supporting letter s and previous service time (82-86 Honorable). My discharge in 1987 was based on a non-reoccurring incident and since I've become a hard working church going individual.” The NDRB considered the applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00439

    Original file (ND04-00439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00049

    Original file (ND00-00049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Copy of Police Record Check Letter from applicant Employment Reference Letters (2) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 840705 - 841216 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 841217 Date of Discharge: 861217 Length of Service (years,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00406

    Original file (ND00-00406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    880625: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 Specs): UA from unit; violation of UCMJ Article 92: disobeyed a lawful written order.Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months (suspended for 6 months), restriction and extra duty for 30 days. MMFR (Applicant)'s defense counsel states in his appeal letter that the senior member was not a line officer; that with the other ships alongside in Bahrain as well as the USS LASALLE, an 0-4 line officer could have been obtained. After a...