Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00432
Original file (ND99-00432.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AMHAA, USNR
Docket No. ND99-00432

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 991213. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
Copy of Request for Criminal Record Check
Criminal Record Check Information
Copy of College Transcript
Employment Reference Letter
Copy of DD Form 214
Service Related Documents (81pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR            880629 - 890625  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 890626               Date of Discharge: 921218

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 23
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 8

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 55

 Highest Rate: AMHAN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.80 (4)    Behavior: 3.35 (4)                OTA : 3.55

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SASMw2*, NUC, SSDR(2 ND ), NDSM, KLM

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – commission of a serious offense, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

890626:  Ordered to active duty for 36 months under the Active Mariner program.

 910813:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Drunken driving.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months (suspended), recommendation for advancement to E4 withdrawn, reduction to E-2 (suspended for 3 months). No indication of appeal in the record.

9206xx:  Most recent substance abuse report indicates applicant completed CAAC Level II Treatment, recommended Alcoholic Anonymous meetings and weekly DAPA counseling not pursued or desired by applicant {Extracted from CO's message}.

921022:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Drunken driving.
         Award: Restriction to VA-115 for 60 days, reduction to E-2, process for Admin Separation. No indication of appeal in the record.
931103:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
921103:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
921117:  Commanding officer recommended discharge general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921123:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

921204:  Commanding officer went back to BUPERS to request applicant be discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) based on member’s contribution to the command.

921231:  BUPERS directed discharge with an other than honorable based on the member’s two serious offenses and the fact that he failed Level II.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 921218 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.
B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article [e.g., 111, drunken driving] if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.


D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE RM 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01138

    Original file (ND99-01138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :880911: Counseling: Advised of deficiency (concerning a motorcycle incident which occurred on 9Sep88. No indication of appeal in the record.890914: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.890915: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00582

    Original file (ND01-00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00582 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010327, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 011018. Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00631

    Original file (ND00-00631.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.920130: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure and misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, drunken driving.920203: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00142

    Original file (ND01-00142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Statement from the applicant Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 911025 - 920301 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 920302 Date of Discharge: 941219 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 09 18 Inactive: None ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00266

    Original file (ND01-00266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-ATAN, USN Docket No. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board has no obligation to change the applicant's discharge in order to allow him to go back to school. There is no requirement or law that grants...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00634

    Original file (ND99-00634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. [EXTRACTED FROM REPORT AND DISPOSITION OF OFFENSE(S) (NAVPERS 1626/7]980126: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a general under honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by Commanding Officer's non-judicial punishment of 2 Feb 96 for violation of UCMJ - Article 92 (failure to obey a lawful...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00447

    Original file (ND01-00447.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from Applicant Letter from the National Personnel Records Center PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 901117 - 901120 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 901121 Date of Discharge: 940217 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00588

    Original file (ND99-00588.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.930901: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of Misconduct due to the Commission of a Serious Offense and alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure.930901: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.930914: Medical screening for drug and/or alcohol dependency. After a thorough review of the records,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00150

    Original file (ND00-00150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant declined treatment.960723: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the Commission of a serious offense as evidence by violation of UCMJ, Article 111 (Drunken driving) and Alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, when he refused to participate in Level II Alcohol treatment.960723: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01195

    Original file (ND99-01195.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issues Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank. 970313: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 111: Drunken or reckless driving. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.