Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00444
Original file (MD99-00444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-PFC, USMC
Docket No. MD99-00444

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 990208, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 991213. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

 1. My undiserable discharge was inadequlable because it was based on one insident in 23 months of service with no other adverse action. And my performance after and during conviction was of the best of my ability.

2. My conviction was also prolonged for over 6 months from time of insident for reasons unknown to me and in regaureds to the time period I also lost mony of my personal belongings due to the neglagence of my squadron VMFA-235 because they failed to inform me of how and where to pick up my belongings because I was supposed to go overseas and when I got in trouble was never told or given the forms to pick up my gear.

 Documentation
The applicant’s service record was thoroughly reviewed. The applicant submitted no additional documentation.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940323            COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 940324               Date of Discharge: 960215

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 10 22
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 68

 Highest Rank: LCpl

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.2 (6)                       Conduct: 4.2 (6)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, Letter of Appreciation

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940208:  Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
950712:  NAVDRUGLAB [San Diego, CA], reported applicant’s urine sample, received 950707, tested positive for methamphetamines.

 951010:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A:
 Specification: Wrongfully use methamphetamines on 950706.
Awarded forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 2 months, restriction for 10 days. Reduction to PFC. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months. Not appealed.
951016:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
951016:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.

951023:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The factual basis for this recommendation was use of methamphetamines.

960112   SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

960122:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 3d Marine Aircraft Wing] directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

960208:  VA treatment rights counseling. Rates and elected treatment for alcohol and drug dependency in conjunction with discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 960215 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board found this issue to be without merit. The applicant implies that a permissive doctrine exists whereby one in the military is allowed a “single incident”. The MarineCorps’ policy on drug abuse is quite clear – zero tolerance. The applicant is obviously confusing this policy with the civilian establishment wherein some offenses, even drug offenses, are treated with leniency because they are a first-time incident. The Marine Corps has no such leniency policy. Relief is denied.

In regard to the applicant’s issue 2, the processing of his discharge, from the time of his NJP until his official notification, does not appear to be prolonged. The allegation about lost personal property and money cannot be addressed by the Board.

 Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 to Present.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article [ e.g., Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days].
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:
                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00256

    Original file (MD01-00256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00256 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001228, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Sincerily Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214Copy of marriage licenseCopy of son's birth certificate Copy of drug screen from North Mississippi Health Services dated November 27,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01140

    Original file (MD02-01140.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01140 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020731, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4 (2 copies)) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00739

    Original file (MD03-00739.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of Methamphetamine on or about 000424.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01312

    Original file (MD03-01312.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 940712 - 940905 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 940906 Date of Discharge: 971205 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 03 00 Inactive: None There is no requirement or law that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00711

    Original file (MD02-00711.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I HAVE NEVER DONE DRUGS BEFORE. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 010222 - 010319 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 010320 Date of Discharge: 011010 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 06 21 Inactive: None At...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00038

    Original file (MD02-00038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 910214 - 910408 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 910409 Date of Discharge: 950217 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 03 10 09 Inactive: None Age at Entry: 20 Years Contracted: 4...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00305

    Original file (MD04-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. I received the maximum judiciary punishment and was still awarded this discharge without the consideration that 28 months of service this was my only infraction.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00559

    Original file (MD02-00559.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PFC, USMC Docket No. MD02-00559 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020321, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 021217.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00472

    Original file (MD99-00472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. 950921: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: Violated Base Order 5560.2J on 18Aug95, to wit: driving on base and state revocation. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00066

    Original file (MD02-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00066 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011002, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The factual basis for this recommendation was the respondent's misconduct as evidenced by wrongful use of...