Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13
Original file (NR3503-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

FeV Se ey seem te ENE ae Ce oe ae
CR Wo rT eer 5

ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

BAN

Docket :NRO3503-13
22 August 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy | Pay
Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/214
of 25 Jui 2013

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the.
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was
advanced to E-5/EOD2 from the September 2009 Navy-wide
advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted ail
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NRO3503-13

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2). the Board
finds the existénce of an injustice warranting the following.
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows: -

a. Petitioner was advanced to E+5/EOD2 from the September
2009 Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16
June 2010 and a Time in Rate date of 1 January 2010.

b. Petitioner was advanced to E-6/HOD1 from the September
2012 Navy-wide advancement exam with an effective date of 16
June 2013 and a Time in Rate date of 1 January 2013.

c. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record. s

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

  

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))}
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

22 August 2013 Ly

W. DEAN PRET
Executive bh tor

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07807-10

    Original file (07807-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/EOD2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04308-10

    Original file (04308-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the © applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 9 August 2010 Wee W. DEAN PFE Executive Diradt DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5391-13

    Original file (NR5391-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Be DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NRO05391-13 16 September 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy el Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 16 September 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9380 13

    Original file (NR9380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to IT2/E5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2783 14

    Original file (NR2783 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to CTR2/E5 from the March 2013 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3410-13

    Original file (NR3410-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tie Ce oie eo Tes Gon fae PE See Nar TY TPL a ae ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket :NR03410-13 22 August 2013 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TO: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF - RECORD 1CO (i, Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the- applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07085-10

    Original file (07085-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. In September 2010, with his final adjudicated clearance, he participated in the E6/AE1 Navy-wide advancement examination and was selected and advanced with an effective date of 16 June 2011. j. Petitioner has applied to this Board seeking to have his E6/AE1 advancement exams validated retroactively for PNA points to apply toward his September 2009 advancement exam. NPC and CNO...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10

    Original file (00082-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00228-11

    Original file (00228-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner’s advancement should be back-dated to ET3/E-4 from the March 2010 Navy- wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 11653 11

    Original file (11653 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to validate his E-4/MC3 Navy-wide advancement examination and show that he met the criteria to be advanced to E-4/MC3 from the September 2010 advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 March 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations,...