Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07807-10
Original file (07807-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 07807-10
15 November 2010

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

LO: Secretary of the Navy
Ref: (a) 10. UsS.€. “L552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Naval Personnel Command (NPC) memo 1430 Ser 811/542 of
6 Oct 10

(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to
E-5/EOD2 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on

8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application
has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
Docket No. 07807-10

finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.

RECOMMENDATION :

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, as
follows:

a. Petitioner was advanced to E-5/EOD2 from the September 2009,
Navy-wide advancement examination with the effective date of 16 June
2010, and a Time In Rate date of 1 January 2010.

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4, Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the
Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled

matter. .
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN WILLIAM J. HESS III

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.

15 November 2010 \y 3

W. DEAN PFRESF
Executive Diyredtto

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3503-13

    Original file (NR3503-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04308-10

    Original file (04308-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the © applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/HM1 from the February 2007, Navy-wide Reserve advancement examination. 9 August 2010 Wee W. DEAN PFE Executive Diradt DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Naval Personnel...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09816-10

    Original file (09816-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-4/ET3 from the September 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08020-10

    Original file (08020-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/AWV1 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08601-10

    Original file (08601-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/AM1 from the February 2009, Reserve Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03465-10

    Original file (03465-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to MA3/E-4 from the September 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 May 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08215-10

    Original file (08215-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-5/EN2 from the March 2009, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 12 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06892-10

    Original file (06892-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a back dated advancement to E-5/IT2 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 23...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00587-10

    Original file (00587-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was advanced to E-6/IT1 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 July 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00082-10

    Original file (00082-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was either advanced to E-4/LS3 from the March 2009 Navy-wide advancement exam or received Passed but Not Advanced (PNA) points from the March 2009 advancement exam cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...