Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2327-13
Original file (NR2327-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 8. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1607
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2480

 

BAN
Docket:NRO02327-13
15 October 2013

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

Ref; (a) Title 10 U.S.c. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

(2) Navy Personnel Command (NPC} memo 1430 Ser 812/0504
of 18 Sept 2013

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the
applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner
retained the permanent rank of E-6/ET1 while in the Naval
Reserve with an effective date of 23 May 1980.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and
George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice
on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice,
finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office
having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in
Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the
request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSTON

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
Docket No.NR02327-13

especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board
finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following

corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate,
as follows:

a. Petitioner retained the permanent rank of E-6/ET1 in
the Naval Reserve with an effective date of 23 May 1980.

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c}) of the revised. Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

f
t
ROBERT D. 4SALMAN BRONTE I. eT once (

Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records {32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
‘announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference {a}, has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

15 October 2013

W. DEAN PFELFFER
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0322 14

    Original file (NR0322 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6/ETl from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 24 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12103-10

    Original file (12103-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the September 2008, Navy-wide advancement examination. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02587-11

    Original file (02587-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (i) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to E-6/ET1 from the March 2010, Navy-wide advancement exam with an , effective date of 16 December 2010, and a Time In Rate date of 1 July 2010. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 June 2011 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2889 14

    Original file (NR2889 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was advanced to ET1/E6 from the March 2011 Navy-wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Ruskin and George reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on.the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8343-13

    Original file (NR8343-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of » mefevence (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-6 from the September 2012 Navy- -wide advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Exnicios and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 February 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1326 13

    Original file (NR1326 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was retired by reason of physical disability on 1 March 2006 with a disability rating of 100%. > The Board. He recommended that the Board consider granting her partial relief by adjusting the date of her transfer to the Retired List from 2011 to 2009.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02982-03

    Original file (02982-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L RECORDS 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ecb Docket No: 2982-03 22 July 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL R E C m Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject's widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05911-10

    Original file (05911-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was permanently retired by reason of physical disability with a rating of 50% or higher. As Petitioner did not submit any documentary evidence in support ef her application, or consent to the release of her Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) records to the Board, and as she failed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5737-13

    Original file (NR5737-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Petitioner filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E-5 from the September 2012 Navy-wide advancement cycle. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 October 2013 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02281-03

    Original file (02281-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 j LCC:dd Docket No: 2281-03 11 June 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Pay...