Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05829-12
Original file (05829-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
_ BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 4001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

JET
Docket No. 5829-12
21 Mar 13

 

 

Dear 1

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552,

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
_ Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 18 March 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 Jul
12, a copy of which is attached. ©

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and

votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
Material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep’ in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
Docket No, 5829-12

naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ©
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

Tyee Ee
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN

Executive Director
Acting

Enclosure: CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 Jul 12

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0744-13

    Original file (NR0744-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 19 Apr 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No, NR744-13 naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the | existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05581-12

    Original file (05581-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS- 314 dtd 10 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05906-12

    Original file (05906-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of’ probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10116 12

    Original file (10116 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicabie statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 18 Dec 12 and CNRC Memo 1133 Ser N3 dtd 25 Apr 13,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05383-12

    Original file (05383-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0311-13

    Original file (NR0311-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, ‘Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314/008 dtd 29 Aug 12, a copy of which is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05413-12

    Original file (05413-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 20 Jun 12, a copy of which is attached. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7520 13

    Original file (NR7520 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 of Cay WER a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04623 12

    Original file (04623 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 11359 12

    Original file (11359 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NN Cc re DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Tye oe Fee pee