Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07312-01
Original file (07312-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0 TRG

Docket No: 7312-01
22 January 2001

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

OF

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an
application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his
record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 22
April 2001 but continued to serve until his reenlistment could be
processed.

The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Ms. McCormick and Ms.

2.
Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 8 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds
follows:

  as

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner's application was filed in a timely manner.

C .

Petitioner reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 23
The next day, he was released from
The record shows that he had

April 1998 for three years.
an extended period of active duty.
completed 11 years, 4 months,
and 7 days of active service at
that time.
On 1 April 1999 he was promoted to GYSGT (E-7). He
was honorably discharged at the expiration of his enlistment on
22 April 2001.

Attached to enclosure (1) is a letter, dated 29 August
2001, from the Marine Corps Reserve Support Center that informed

d.

Petitioner that his request for a three month extension to allow
reenlistment could not be processed because it had not been
submitted in time.
reenlistment could not be processed.
should contact a prior service recruiter if he wanted to
reenlist.

Therefore, his subsequent request for

He was informed that he

Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 20
He states that he was told by the prior service

SeptZer  2001.
recruiter to apply to this Board because it would take 9 to 12
months to get a request for reenlistment approved.
is corrected to show that he is still a member of the Marine
Corps Reserve, he can request an immediate reenlistment while in
the Individual Ready Reserve  
service recruiter.

(IRR) without action by the prior

If his record

CONCLUSION:

The letter from the MCRSC shows that he requested an

but he did not return it in time
Since Petitioner's request for reenlistment has

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
extension so he could reenlist,
for processing.
not yet been submitted by the prior service recruiter, it will
still be many months before he can get approval for reenlistment.
Given the circumstances, the Board concludes that the record
should be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 23
April 2001 but extended that enlistment for a period of 15
months.
2002 to get an immediate reenlistment through the system.

An extension of 15 months will give him until 23 July

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand that he extended his enlistment for 15
months.

RECOMMENDATION:

a.
That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show
he was not discharged on 23 April 2001 but extended his
enlistment for a period of 15 months.

that

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

b.
naval record.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and

2

complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above
matter.

entitled

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

_

_ 

5.
Pursuant to the delegation of
authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of
the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04356-00

    Original file (04356-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At enclosure (l), an advisory opinion from the Reserve Affairs Division, Career Management Team (CMT), HQMC, states that at no time did Petitioner request an additional extension to remain in the Marine Corps Reserve until the date gap surrounding the missing fitness report was resolved. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by showing he reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve for three years on 15 April 2000 vice the two-year reenlistment on 12 April 2001 now of record. That he be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00

    Original file (02064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09851-05

    Original file (09851-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Docket No: 9851-0510 May 2006 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the reenlistment code from a former enlistment be changed. Therefore, the Board concludes that no useful purpose is now served by the 1998 RE-4 reenlistment code and a correction to the record is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05646-01

    Original file (05646-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 5 October 1999. However, if Petitioner was in fact it appears that he was not in a vice the discharge of 24 April Therefore, given the requirements...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07791-00

    Original file (07791-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He obtained the fitness report on 5 November 2000. states he was honorably discharged at the expiration of enlistment, as extended, on 6 November 2000. If The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the circumstances which led to his further service and crediting of drills. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that a. he was not discharged became...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04136-01

    Original file (04136-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, this Board requesting, in effect, record be corrected to show he was entitled to full separation pay when he was discharged from the Marine Corps on 21 November 2000. that the applicable naval filed enclosure (1) with The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, Harrison, and 2. Petitioner asserts that his request to reenlist was not processed properly by his command or Headquarters CMC, MMEA-6. Because the request was overtaken by events MMEA-6 The...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01387-01

    Original file (01387-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1387-01 17 April 2001 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06245-00

    Original file (06245-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a retired enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the nonjudicial punishment (NJP) awarded him on 6 May 1998 and the competency review board proceedings that reduced him in rank. CONCLUSION: The Board concurs with the advisory opinion that the NJP In this regard, there is Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04938-01

    Original file (04938-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 21 January 1999. About this time, he transferred to the On 22 October 1998 a three month On 17 d. On 17 May 2001 Headquarters Marine Corps...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00404-00

    Original file (00404-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the Board finds that Petitioner ’s promotion should have been effected before the President acted to remove him from the promotion list, they conclude that the President’s removal action was a nullity. Petitioner would have been promoted on 26 September 1997 if his appointment had not been delayed. not have an effective date of appointment.