Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04329-11
Original file (04329-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

TAL
Docket No: 4329-11
22 February 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Lo Secretary of the Navy

    

Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

Ref : (a) 10° U.8.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general
characterization of his discharge of 20 January 1952 be changed.

2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Pfeiffer and Ms.
Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 15 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed ina
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.
c. Petitioner was assigned to extended active duty in the
Marine Corps on 21 September 1950 and served honorably until
released on 15 September 1950. On 20 January 1952, he was
discharged from the Marine Corp Reserve and assigned a general
characterization. He was not the subject of any disciplinary
action. At the time of his discharge he had a conduct average
of 4.0 which was sufficiently high for a fully honorable
characterization of service.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board's finding is based on his periodic conduct
marks. The Board notes that his conduct average of 4.0 was
sufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable characterization
of service. Based on the foregoing the Board concludes that no
useful purpose is served by continuing to characterize his
service as having been under honorable conditions, and
recharacterization to a fully honorable discharge is
appropriate.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an
injustice warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record is corrected to show that
he was honorably discharged on 20 January 1952 vice being issued
a general discharge under honorable conditions on the same day.

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or
relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added:to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from
Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together
with a copy of this Report of Proceedings, for retention ina
confidential file maintained for such purpose, with no cross
reference being made a part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
presented at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN \ Hog

BRIAN J. GEORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on

behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06450-01

    Original file (06450-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6450-01 29 January 2002 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy From: To: Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 19 December 1952. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01685-10

    Original file (01685-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which were available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. CONCLUSION: Upon reviq@w and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting upgrading Petitioner's general discharge to an honorable characterization of service. The Board particularly notes that he had no disciplinary action and his proficiency and conduct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7145 13

    Original file (NR7145 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was not the subject of any disciplinary action during his term of active duty service. CONCLUSION; Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warrajfting upgrading Petitioner’s general discharge to an honorable characterization of service. The Board particularly notes that he had no disciplinary action and his conduct mark average was almost high enough to qualify for a fully honorable discharge.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07397-07

    Original file (07397-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMW Docket No: 7397-07 12 May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD oF & Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable discharge vice the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06091-10

    Original file (06091-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Gattis, Spain, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. titioner served without disciplinary incident and that his unsatisfactory performance was based solely on his failure to meet physical fitness standards. The Board notes that Pe Board concludes that no useful...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 01801-05

    Original file (01801-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr., Mr.and Mr., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 August 2005, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show he was separated with an honorable discharge on 3 August 1954 and that he was recommended for reenlistment, vice the under honorable conditions discharge and the non-recommendation for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00631-10

    Original file (00631-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her general characterization of service issued on 25 October 1991, be changed to an honorable discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was issued an honorable discharge on 25 October 1991 vice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01946-02

    Original file (01946-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that his service was characterized as honorable upon his release from active duty, and that he received an honorable discharge at the end of his military obligation. the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. That this naval record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04075-06

    Original file (04075-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed.2 The Board consisting of Messrs and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 November 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR2158 15

    Original file (NR2158 15.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2480 TIR Docket No: 2158-15 30 March 2015 ‘From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF (ey vsuc, XXX-XX Ref: (a) 10 U.S.c. e. With Petitioner’s application is an appeal for consideration of his characterization of service based on his diagnosed post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a clinical psychological...