DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
: 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS
Docket No: 11271-10
3 November 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 October 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. Your complete record was not available to the
Board.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 August 2006.
On 29 June 2007 you received an honorable discharge by reason of
a condition, not a disability, and were assigned a reentry code
of RE-3G.
An RE-3G reentry code is the most favorable code authorized by
regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a
condition, not a disability. The Board thus concluded that there
is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Ld SSvank
i W. DEAN PFEIL
+ he f ait rete “ HigR te | ’ Execut ive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2598 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7091S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5410 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof,-your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Finally, Sailors discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability would normally be assigned an RE-4 reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06592-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00084-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2010. In this regard, you were assigned the most favorable reenlistment code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4526 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. At that time you were assigned an RE-3G reentry code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08448-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-3G reentry code due to your diagnosed adjustment disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04601-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application.on 22 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07025-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the Board. It is the most favorable code authorized for Marines discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability, as you were. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04182-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you were discharged from the Navy on 28 Marcy 2007, when you were discharged by reason of a condition, not a disability, which interfered with your performance of duty, and assigned a reentry code of RE-3G, to indicate that you require a waiver in order to become eligible...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07514-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your characterization of service or reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.