Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12059-10
Original file (12059-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd
Docket No. 12059-10
14 December 2010

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
MGs Secretary of the Navy

Subj : FN ee va

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U,S#E. L552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 29 Oct 10 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 23 Nov 10

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
orrected by removing the fitness report for 1 February to

G
16 November 2009, signed Je copy of which

is at Tab A.

2. The Board, consisting oj

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on

9 December 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office having

cognizance over the subject matter of this case has commented to the
effect the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
Gorpective action.

RECOMMENDATION :

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following fitness report:

Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

léNovi0 ey: 09° icxovos

b. That NO memorandum be filed in place of the report to be
removed, as the report is not needed to maintain continuity.

c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review
and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

‘

DPSViAEAON Lt firrithnron

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference

(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.

ie EN Ph
-a—W. DEAN PS TFFER

Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01103-12

    Original file (01103-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. 2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Silberman and Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 1 March 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06664-11

    Original file (06664-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Aldrich and Messrs. Pfeiffer and Spain, reviewed Pétitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 September 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the limited corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)") entry dated 26 October 2010. That any material or entries inconsistent with...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03806-10

    Original file (03806-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Ms. Siler and Messrs. Delorier and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 6 May 2010, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The FY 2011 AR Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, which considered Petitioner with a corrected fitness report record but status as an officer who had failed of © selection to lieutenant colonel, selected him. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10352-09

    Original file (10352-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Sep 09 w/attachment (2) PERS-32 memo dtd 22 Oct 09 i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 February to 20 August 2008 (copy at Tab A). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00251-03

    Original file (00251-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Adams, Geisler and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2003, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That NO memorandum be filed in Petitioner's naval record to replace the removed report, as this report is not needed for continuity. We recommend the report in question be removed fi-om the member's record.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11036-08

    Original file (11036-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 27 September to 7 December 2006 (copy at Tab A), and replacing it with a "not observed" report for the same period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Boyd, Ivins and Rothlein, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2009, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2080 14

    Original file (NR2080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 31 January to 1 December 2012, together with a ietter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so chat the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Marquez and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04493-09

    Original file (04493-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    04493-09 9 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub): i co , REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. PERS-00J ltr dtd 10 Aug 09 w/enclosure PERS-834 ltr dtd 21 Aug 09 PERS-32 memo dtd 2 Sep 09 ty a ea mw “4: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing all reference to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00378-11

    Original file (00378-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 August 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. e. In enclosure (5), the HOMC office with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s implied request to remove her failure of selection for promotion commented to the effect that this request should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 03443 12

    Original file (03443 12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S,. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by completely removing the fitness report for 18 June 2007 to 31 May 2008 (copy at Tab A), modified in his previous case by the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) by removal of section K...