Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01103-12
Original file (01103-12.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490

 

HD: hd
Docket No. 01103-12
2 March 2012

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

FE n-ne

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 16 Jan 12 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 13 Feb 12

iT Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with
this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval
record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1
November 2009 to 22 June 2010, together with the letter
transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so that
the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for
this period. Copies of the original report, the letter of
transmittal and the supplemental report are at Tabs A, B, and C
respectively.

2 The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Silberman and
Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
on 1 March 2012, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3 The Board having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office
having cognizance over the subject matter of this case has
commented to the effect the request has merit and warrants
favorable action.
CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an error and injustice warranting the following
corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing
therefrom the following original fitness report and related
material, including the transmittal letter dated 31 May 2011, leaving
in the record the supplemental report covering the same period:

Period of Report
Date of Report Reporting Senior From To

a

b. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.

c. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this
Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review

and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Puna teu Jd. fLyeFiw

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder Acting Recorder
Bis Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)

of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
under the authority of reference

foregoing corrective action, taken
d on behalf of the Secretary of

(a), has been approved by the Boar

the Navy.
Fe2z_w. DEAN oe ek

Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2080 14

    Original file (NR2080 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 31 January to 1 December 2012, together with a ietter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so chat the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Marquez and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11 14

    Original file (NR11 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the transmittal letter, the reporting senior explains that all original reports were erroneously submitted with the same “Promotable” promotion recommendation. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following original fitness report and related material, inciuding the letter of transmittal dated 10 July 2013, leaving in the record the supplemental report covering the same period: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To Wie) Feb 12 O01 Dec 12 15 Dec...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03437-10

    Original file (03437-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD :hd Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geberth, Pfeiffer and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 26 January 2011, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following original...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01286-03

    Original file (01286-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 September 2001 to 15 September 2002 and the letter of transmittal forwarding both a supplemental report for the same period and a "FitreplEval Summary Letter," so that the supplemental report will be the only report in his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06305-07

    Original file (06305-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner’s application at enclosure (1) includes a letter dated 2 July 2007 from the reporting senior stating the following:The initial report for this period was mailed to BUPERS [Bureau of Naval Personnel] without my approved corrections to the draft report. He notes that his PSR entry for the period in question does not reflect, as it should, that supplemental material has been submitted, but that this error will not have to be corrected if his request is approved.MAJORITY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 01485-08

    Original file (01485-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1 November 2004 to 3 June 2005, together with a letter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so that the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Ms. Humberd and Messrs. Boyd and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08643-07

    Original file (08643-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original fitness report for 1 May to 17 August 2006, together with a letter-supplement and a letter transmitting a supplemental report for the same period, so that the supplemental report will be the only report in the record for this period. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W....

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08467-08

    Original file (08467-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by modifying the marks and comments of the enlisted performance evaluation report for 10 July 2005 to 15 March 2006 (copy at Tab A), in accordance with a letter dated 14 August 2008 from the reporting senior (at enclosure (1)) because the report erroneously reflected that he had failed the Spring...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07615-08

    Original file (07615-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 April 2007 to 15 April 2008 and the letter of transmittal forwarding a supplemental report for the same period, so that the supplemental report will be the only report in his record for the period involved. The Board,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2458 14

    Original file (NR2458 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the original enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 November 2011 to 15 August 2012, signed by Lieutenant Commander H. R. F---, Supply Corps, U. S. Navy Reserve, and the evaluation report letter-supplement Gated 25 Ahugust 2013 (copies at Tab B), and replacing them with the...