DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 11062-10
27 October 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 27 October 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you served in the Navy from 15 December 2009
to 29 July 2010, when you were discharged by reason of misconduct
due to the commission of a serious offense, with a discharge
under other than honorable conditions. You were assigned a
reentry code of RE-4 as required by governing directives.
As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not
demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the
Board to assign a more favorable code as an exception to policy,
there is no basis for granting your request. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you did
not request such consideration and you have not exhausted an
available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval
Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do so by submitting the
attached DD Form 293.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
-Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
“record, the burden is on‘the applicant to demonstrate the
« existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFET
Executive Diffec
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11448-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the zi of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05410-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 May 2010. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. As your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10635-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03045-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2010. Applicable reguiations normally require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to individuals who are not recommended for retention in the last evaluation report issued prior to their separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03915-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that an RE-3K reentry code is waivable and is the most favorable you could have received under your circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12859-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ; application on 13 January 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 October 1994. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12271-10
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10666-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. On 19 April 2000 you were given a diagnosis of asthma, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment and not correctable to meet Navy Standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the e&istence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05349-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. : , After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00352-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...