DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 12859-09
19 January 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ;
application on 13 January 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 4 October 1994.
On 19 October 1994, you were given a diagnosis of symptomatic pes
planus, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment.
Available records indicate that you failed to disclose your
history of painful feet when you applied for enlistment. On 27
October 1994 you received an entry level separation by reason of
your failure to meet medical/physical procurement standards, and
were assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to Sailors who are separated
due to their failure to meet medical/physical procurement
standards. Your desire to reenter does not provide a basis for
changing your reentry code, which was properly assigned to .
reflect your status at that time. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
Favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10666-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. On 19 April 2000 you were given a diagnosis of asthma, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment and not correctable to meet Navy Standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the e&istence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10613-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. On 20 August 2002 you were given a diagnosis of bee sting allergy, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment and not correctable to meet Navy Standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 13307-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. On 22 March 1994, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of defective enlistment and erroneous enlistment due to the diagnosed instability of your right shoulder which was not disclosed prior to your entry into the Navy. Based on the medical evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of failed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08226-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01396-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2010. On 16 December 2009 you were given a diagnosis of migraine headaches, which was considered disqualifying for enlistment and not correctable to meet Navy Standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04052-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06398-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2010. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00970-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting] in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to jestablish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of on official naval record, the burden/is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08063-09
°° A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08063-09
°° A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 10 August 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.