Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11042-10
Original file (11042-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX JRE
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No. 11042-10
8 November 2010

 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy

NAVAL RECORD

 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
(b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 Jul 09
Enel: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,

hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of
his record as indicated in enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of vs, SEEEMes cd Messrs. Cn

and viewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 4 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.

b. Petitioner's case is within the category of cases covered
by reference (b).

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
in accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board
directs the corrective action indicated below.

As Petitioner's case has not been finalized by the Naval
Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final
rating of 50% or higher for posttraumatic stress disorder is
premature and was not considered by the Board. He may reapply to
the Board after he has exhausted his administrative remedies

within the DES.

RECOMMENDATION:

 

a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that
he was assigned a disability rating of 50% vice 10% for
posttraumatji® stress disorder when his name was placed on the
Temporary Disability Retired List effective 1 November 2007, and
a combined rating of 60% vice 30% provided that such action does
not adversely affect his total compensation, including but not
limited to combat-related special compensation.

b. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval
record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the

Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal gq..."

Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it i certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregogng is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN ES R. EXNICIOS
Recorder cting Recorder

 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

lo ea

W. DEAN Pree

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10145-10

    Original file (10145-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10145-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS; Secretary of the Navy Subj ps a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs _eueet Gu anc qua reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11212-10

    Original file (11212-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11212-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL REC Ref: (a) 10 U.SsC. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08564-10

    Original file (08564-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    08564-10 1 October 2010 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (ay 10° UiS2e, 1552 (b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries, 17 Jul O09 Fncl: (1) DD Form 149 ie Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). As Petitioner's case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08562-10

    Original file (08562-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). aS a and Mr. aw reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10139-10

    Original file (10139-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final rating of 50% for posttraumatic stress disorder is premature and was not considered by the Board. Pursuant to the delegation of Ete set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05582-10

    Original file (05582-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01141-11

    Original file (01141-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1141-11 11 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 To. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on il February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12889-10

    Original file (12889-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13438-10

    Original file (13438-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13441-10

    Original file (13441-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...