Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08564-10
Original file (08564-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
JRE

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
Docket No. 08564-10
1 October 2010

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

Subj:
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (ay 10° UiS2e, 1552
(b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 Jul O09
Fncl: (1) DD Form 149
ie Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of

 

his record as indicated in enclosure (1).

2. The Board, consisting of vessrs, Se? Simp... ep

reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 23
September 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner, or it is in
the interest of justice to excuse Petitioner’s failure to file
enclosure (1) in a timely manner.

b. Petitioner’s case is within the category of cases covered
by reference (b).

CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
in accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board

directs the corrective action indicated below.

As Petitioner's case has not been finalized by the Naval
Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final
rating of 50% for posttraumatic stress disorder is premature and
was not considered by the Board. He may reapply to the Board
after he has exhausted his administrative remedies within the
DES.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

 

a. Maat” Petitioner's AMWMBMecdrd Be correctéd #8 snow that
he was assigned a disability rating of 50% for posttraumatic
stress disorder when his name was placed on the Temporary
Disability Retired List effective 11 November 2008, vice 30%,
provided that such action does not adversely affect his total
compensation, including but not limited to combat-related
special compensation.

b. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval
record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is PMP iHad a qu@in lah
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's
proceedings in the above entitled mecESE «

  
 

 

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN jf JAMES 'RY-EXNICIOS
Recorder f Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

Lys

W. DI

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10139-10

    Original file (10139-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final rating of 50% for posttraumatic stress disorder is premature and was not considered by the Board. Pursuant to the delegation of Ete set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08562-10

    Original file (08562-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). aS a and Mr. aw reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10145-10

    Original file (10145-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    10145-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS; Secretary of the Navy Subj ps a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs _eueet Gu anc qua reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05582-10

    Original file (05582-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11212-10

    Original file (11212-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11212-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL REC Ref: (a) 10 U.SsC. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11042-10

    Original file (11042-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of vs, SEEEMes cd Messrs. Cn and viewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 November 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01141-11

    Original file (01141-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1141-11 11 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 To. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on il February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13438-10

    Original file (13438-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12889-10

    Original file (12889-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11871-10

    Original file (11871-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    11871-10 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 7 January 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the delegation...