DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE
Docket No. 13438-10
28 January 2011
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
TOs Secretary of the Navy
el EE RS POE ce RR ee A
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 20 U.8.€. 1552
(b) DUSD (P&R) Memorandum for the Service Secretaries,
17 Jul og
Encl: (1) DD Form 149
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his
record as indicated in enclosure (1).
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21
January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
3, The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:
a. Enclosure (1) was filed in a timely manner.
b. Petitioner’s case is within the category of cases covered by
reference (b).
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and in
accordance with the provisions of reference (b), the Board directs
the corrective action indicated below.
As Petitioner's case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability
Evaluation System (DES), his request for a final rahing of 50% oF
higher for posttraumatic stress disorder is premature and was not
considered by the Board. He may reapply to the Board after he has
exhausted his administrative remedies within the DES.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on
29 June 2006, when his name was placed on the Temporary Disability
Retired List, he was assigned a disability rating for posttraumatic
stress disorder of 50% vice 30%, and a combined rating of 60% vice
50%, provided that such action does not adversely affect his total
compensation, including but not limited to combat-related special
compensation.
b. That a copy of these proceedings be filed in his naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
a ge
ROBERT D. Z4SALMAN james . EXNICIOS
Acting Recorder
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
W. DEAN PHEI
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08562-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). aS a and Mr. aw reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. As Petitioner’s case has not been finalized by the Naval Disability Evaluation System (DES), his request for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01141-11
1141-11 11 February 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TOs Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 To. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on il February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12889-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13441-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00501-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, J. Hicks and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 February 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13442-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and imusiee om 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12884-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of her record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. W. Hicks, Spooner and Storz reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11871-10
11871-10 WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 7 January 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: {a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Recorder Acting Recorder 5, Pursuant to the delegation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12883-10
12883-10 7 January 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Sub}: a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Dunn and Ivins reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ioe ROBERT D. ZSALMAN HS R. EB Recorder Acting Re¢order 5, Pursuant to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10145-10
10145-10 1 November 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records TS; Secretary of the Navy Subj ps a REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, requests correction of his record as indicated in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs _eueet Gu anc qua reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 October 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...