DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BIG
Docket No: 8969-10
28 April 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of bible 10 of Che
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 April 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You entered active duty in the Navy on 25 January 1989. Your
record is incomplete, but while at recruit training, you were
administratively separated due to entry level
performance/conduct. On 22 February 1989, you received an
uncharacterized entry level separation due to entry level
performance/conduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended
for retention) reenlistment code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth,
remorse, character reference letter, and current desire to
serve in the armed forces. However, the Board concluded that
your RE-4 reenlistment code should not be changed due to your
entry level performance/conduct and failure to complete recruit
training. You are advised that no reenlistment code is changed
due merely to the passage of time or post service good conduct.
In view of the above, your application has been denied. The
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
EAN PF]
Executive Di r
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00403-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. On 15 August 1989 you were notified of pending separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the narrative reason for separation was administratively and procedurally correct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11433-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2011. You were notified of the recommendation that you be discharged with an uncharacterized separation due to entry level performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11698-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, the separation authority directed an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of performance and conduct, and on 20 April...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 01609 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were notified of the recommendation that you would be discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation due to performance and conduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05581-09
2B three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. However, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code, characterization of service or separation code due to your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00480-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2007. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to entry level performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02329-08
A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Records, sitting in executive session, considered y application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Boay your application, together with all material submit thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes and policies. After review, the separation autho an entry level separation by reason of entry level and conduct and you were so separated on 2 Februar that time you were not recommended for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00706-11
A three-member panel of the Boara for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2011. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of the narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code, which were based on your performance and conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4460 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 19 April 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08446-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that you were correctly assigned the RE-4 reentry code due to your alcohol dependence diagnosis.