DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
SMW
Docket No: 480-07
24 July 2007
Dear @auaipanaR
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 July 2007. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies...
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 24 January 1989 at age 21. On
6 February 1989 you received a medical evaluation during which
you stated that you had suicidal ideations before and after
enlistment. On 6 February 1989 a psychiatric evaluation
diagnosed you with an adjustment disorder manifested by an
anxious mood and manipulative claims of suicidal ideation. The
evaluation concluded by recommending discharge due to your
failure to adapt.
Based on the information currently contained in your record, it
appears that your commanding officer (CO) subsequently
recommended an entry level separation by reason of entry level
performance and conduct. In connection with this action, you
would have acknowledged the separation action and been afforded
an opportunity to consult counsel and submit a statement in
response to the separation action. Apparently, the separation
authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed an
entry level separation by reason of entry level performance and
conduct. On 23 February 1989 you were so discharged. At that
time you were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code, which means
that you are neither eligible nor recommended for reenlistment.
Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged due to entry level performance
and conduct. In addition, individuals who disclose suicidal
ideations are not recommended for reenlistment, since they are
considered a potential risk to harm themselves and others if
retained. Since you have been treated no differently than others
in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice
in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely, s
\Sveads
W. DEAN P
Executive Di Xr
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05018-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2010. On 5 April 1989, you were notified of pending administrative separation action due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03886-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the discharge authority Thereafter, You did not You were The fact that you did not receive The Board noted your contention to the effect that you During classification interviews in recruit it is determined whether an individual is qualified for "A" school, even though you had and as a result...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08086-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regu1atio~ 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08212-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 4 September 2002, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 3 February 2003, you began another UA. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03431-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your suicidal ideation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13798-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error of injustice. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed depressive disorder,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00598-09
Based on the mental health evaluation, you were processed for separation by reason of other physical and mental conditions due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Nevertheless, the Board found these factors were insufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01108-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 14 January 1999 at age 23 and served without disciplinary incident. At...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10600-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicabie statutes, regulations, and policies. On 27 Pebruary 2007 you were notified of pending administrative separation by reason OL erroneous entry due to the diagnosed psychiatric problems. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00403-11
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2011. On 15 August 1989 you were notified of pending separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to the diagnosed personality disorder. The Board concluded that the narrative reason for separation was administratively and procedurally correct.