Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08461-10
Original file (08461-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

 

BAN
Docket No. 08461-10
31 January 2011

 

This is in reference to your application for correction to your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 January 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan Program
Manager Casualty Assistance (N135C) of 4 January 2011, a copy of
which is attached, enclosure (1).

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. In addition, on
20 September 2010, you emailed our office a copy of your
notification of eligibility and stated, “I do not see where I
made a selection”. Therefore, our office is enclosing a copy
your original Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan election
form you completed with spousal concurrence on 4 March 1991,
enclosure (2). The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
Docket No. 0861-10

that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or

injustice.

Sincerely,

 

 

Enclosures

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01376-02

    Original file (01376-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC 1741 MMSR-6 of 27 March 2002, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10865-02

    Original file (10865-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH: ddj Docket No: 10865-02 22 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11753-10

    Original file (11753-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04858-11

    Original file (04858-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06521-02

    Original file (06521-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application; together with all material submitted in record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND 5720...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07253-10

    Original file (07253-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any change to your husband’s RCSBP election. Under this option, if the retiree dies before reaching age 60, a survivor annuity is payable on the date the member would have attained age 60. Option C - Immediate annuity.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10281-06

    Original file (10281-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10281-0631 January 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07863-06

    Original file (07863-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    7863-06 4 January 2007This is in deference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09201-06

    Original file (09201-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03140-03

    Original file (03140-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to...