DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No. 11753-10
7 February 2011
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 7 February 2011. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. The Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) Program
Manager Casualty Assistance (N135C) memo of 12 Jan 11, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. However, the
Board noted that you are able to enroll your spouse, ae
GHEE 3p the Survivor Benefit Plan under spousal coverage vice
Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan before your 60 birthday
on 20 February 2011. Your point of contact is Mr. Rick Riden at
the Naval Personnel Command (NPC) at (901) 874-4297. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind
that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive Di
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04858-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08461-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Plan Program Manager Casualty Assistance (N135C) of 4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 08353-10
You learned that he was not participating in the SBP in, approximately, 1991. Prior to his retirement, he declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) by filing a NAVCOMPT 2272. There is no evidence that Qs sought to enroll in SBP during the open seasons.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07253-10
Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant any change to your husband’s RCSBP election. Under this option, if the retiree dies before reaching age 60, a survivor annuity is payable on the date the member would have attained age 60. Option C - Immediate annuity.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01778-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum of 6 April 2004, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In response to reference (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05643-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07380-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12983-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Under these circumstances, the Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice that would warrant relief. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04500 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Records show that in April 1999, your husband was notified by the attached letter (enclosure 2) that he had completed all of Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 02545-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...